European journal of medical research · 2025
A study on strategies to optimize bladder volume consistency in radiotherapy patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Shunan, Lin Haitao, Chen Ying, Hu Qunchao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the impact of multi-step workflow optimization on enhancing the consistency of bladder volume among patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy.
METHODS: Patients requiring bladder preparation were selected through simple random sampling before and after the implementation of optimization measures in June 2024. Each cohort included 5 patients with prostate cancer, 15 with cervical cancer, and 10 with rectal cancer cases. Statistical methods were used to evaluate the correlation and consistency between bladder volume measured by cone-beam CT (VCBCT) and a portable scanner (VHD5), as well as the differences of the absolute bladder volume discrepancy (|VCBCT-VHD5|), before and after the implementation.
RESULTS: Pearson correlation analysis showed that a strong correlation between VCBCT and VHD5 both pre-optimization measures (r = 0.75, P < 0.001) and post-optimization measures (r = 0.73, P < 0.001). The mean of VCBCT-VHD5 was 30.67 mL, with a standard deviation (SD) of 51.40 mL, and the limits of agreement was (- 70.07, 131.40) mL before the implementation. The mean decreased to 5.03 mL, with a SD of 26.02 mL, and the limits of agreement was (- 45.97, 56.03) mL after the implementation. Wilcoxon rank-sum test revealed that the volume of |VCBCT-VHD5| before was 39.00 (18.00, 67.00) mL, and it was 22.00 (15.00, 28.50) mL after with a statistically significant (Z = -7.66, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Multi-step workflow optimization reduced the standard deviation of differences between CBCT-derived and scanner-derived bladder volumes (VCBCT and VHD5), decreased the absolute volume discrepancy (|VCBCT-VHD5|), and improved bladder volume consistency in patients with prostate, cervical, and rectal cancers.
METHODS: Patients requiring bladder preparation were selected through simple random sampling before and after the implementation of optimization measures in June 2024. Each cohort included 5 patients with prostate cancer, 15 with cervical cancer, and 10 with rectal cancer cases. Statistical methods were used to evaluate the correlation and consistency between bladder volume measured by cone-beam CT (VCBCT) and a portable scanner (VHD5), as well as the differences of the absolute bladder volume discrepancy (|VCBCT-VHD5|), before and after the implementation.
RESULTS: Pearson correlation analysis showed that a strong correlation between VCBCT and VHD5 both pre-optimization measures (r = 0.75, P < 0.001) and post-optimization measures (r = 0.73, P < 0.001). The mean of VCBCT-VHD5 was 30.67 mL, with a standard deviation (SD) of 51.40 mL, and the limits of agreement was (- 70.07, 131.40) mL before the implementation. The mean decreased to 5.03 mL, with a SD of 26.02 mL, and the limits of agreement was (- 45.97, 56.03) mL after the implementation. Wilcoxon rank-sum test revealed that the volume of |VCBCT-VHD5| before was 39.00 (18.00, 67.00) mL, and it was 22.00 (15.00, 28.50) mL after with a statistically significant (Z = -7.66, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Multi-step workflow optimization reduced the standard deviation of differences between CBCT-derived and scanner-derived bladder volumes (VCBCT and VHD5), decreased the absolute volume discrepancy (|VCBCT-VHD5|), and improved bladder volume consistency in patients with prostate, cervical, and rectal cancers.