International journal of speech-language pathology · 2017
Implementation of an extended scope of practice speech-language pathology allied health practitioner service: An evaluation of service impacts and outcomes.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Seabrook Marnie, Schwarz Maria, Ward Elizabeth C, Whitfield Bernard
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Extended scope of practice roles can address health service challenges and enhance patient services; however there has been limited research of extended scope roles in the discipline of speech-language pathology (SLP). The aim of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes and service impacts of a Speech-Language Pathology Allied Health Practitioner (SLP AHP) led dysphagia and dysphonia service within an Integrated Specialist Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) Service.
METHOD: Low risk referrals were triaged by ENT from the waiting list into the SLP AHP dysphagia and dysphonia clinic. Outcomes from an initial 6-month pilot phase (n = 43) and 6-month implementation phase (n = 158) were evaluated.
RESULT: Approximately 70% of patients managed in the SLP AHP clinic in both phases were discharged without requiring separate ENT appointments. There were no adverse events. In the pilot phase, only 4.3% of medium priority and 10% of low priority referrals were seen within clinically recommended time frames. This improved to 90% in the final three months of the implementation phase.
CONCLUSION: With appropriate governance and risk management, an extended scope SLP AHP service for low risk dysphagia and dysphonia can achieve safe, effective and beneficial changes to ENT service delivery.
METHOD: Low risk referrals were triaged by ENT from the waiting list into the SLP AHP dysphagia and dysphonia clinic. Outcomes from an initial 6-month pilot phase (n = 43) and 6-month implementation phase (n = 158) were evaluated.
RESULT: Approximately 70% of patients managed in the SLP AHP clinic in both phases were discharged without requiring separate ENT appointments. There were no adverse events. In the pilot phase, only 4.3% of medium priority and 10% of low priority referrals were seen within clinically recommended time frames. This improved to 90% in the final three months of the implementation phase.
CONCLUSION: With appropriate governance and risk management, an extended scope SLP AHP service for low risk dysphagia and dysphonia can achieve safe, effective and beneficial changes to ENT service delivery.