International urology and nephrology · 2025
Association rules of social alienation in maintenance hemodialysis patients: an Apriori algorithm analysis and intervention strategies.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wanning Jia, Qinqlai Zhang, Ping Guo, Qiuxia Gao, Fang Wan, Dan Cheng, Chunyan Yang, Li Li, Wenwen He
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Social alienation significantly impacts maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. This study aimed to identify key factors associated with social alienation in MHD patients using association rule mining to inform interventions.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study enrolled 250 MHD patients from 11 centers (March-April 2025). Social alienation was assessed using the General Alienation Scale (GAS). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analyzed using the Apriori algorithm with thresholds: support ≥ 30%, confidence ≥ 50%, lift > 1.
RESULTS: Among participants, 49.2% (n = 123) reported social alienation. Seven strong association rules were identified. Key combinations included: Urban employee insurance + thrice-weekly dialysis (support 58.8%, confidence 54.4%); Male + urban employee insurance + thrice-weekly dialysis (support 36.8%, confidence 54.4%); Age 36-50 + Han ethnicity (support 31.2%, confidence 56.4%). A dialysis treatment plan of 4-5 h per week for three times, middle-aged working patients, and limited support were prominent risk factors.
CONCLUSION: Social alienation in MHD patients is multifactorial. Interventions should include flexible dialysis scheduling, multidisciplinary psychosocial support, and community networks. Policy reforms addressing insurance-related employment stress are needed. Data-driven strategies enhance chronic disease management.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study enrolled 250 MHD patients from 11 centers (March-April 2025). Social alienation was assessed using the General Alienation Scale (GAS). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analyzed using the Apriori algorithm with thresholds: support ≥ 30%, confidence ≥ 50%, lift > 1.
RESULTS: Among participants, 49.2% (n = 123) reported social alienation. Seven strong association rules were identified. Key combinations included: Urban employee insurance + thrice-weekly dialysis (support 58.8%, confidence 54.4%); Male + urban employee insurance + thrice-weekly dialysis (support 36.8%, confidence 54.4%); Age 36-50 + Han ethnicity (support 31.2%, confidence 56.4%). A dialysis treatment plan of 4-5 h per week for three times, middle-aged working patients, and limited support were prominent risk factors.
CONCLUSION: Social alienation in MHD patients is multifactorial. Interventions should include flexible dialysis scheduling, multidisciplinary psychosocial support, and community networks. Policy reforms addressing insurance-related employment stress are needed. Data-driven strategies enhance chronic disease management.