MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/02841859709172071

Медицинская библиотека · Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 1997

Diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon. A comparison of CT, colonic enema and laparoscopy.

Stefánsson T, Nyman R, Nilsson S, Ekbom A, Påhlman L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of laparoscopy, CT, colonic enema (CE), and laboratory tests (white blood cell count (WBC), sedimentation rate (SR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in diagnosing diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

The diagnostic methods were prospectively evaluated in 88 patients, 30 of whom were referred for laparoscopy.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were found to have sigmoid diverticulitis: 20 patients by laparoscopy, 21 by CT, and 11 by CE combined with one positive laboratory test. Laparoscopy proved to be superior to the other diagnostic methods in diagnosing diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon. CT had a high specificity (1.0; 95% CI: 0.92-1.0) but low sensitivity (0.69; 95% CI: 0.56-0.79) in detecting diverticulitis. CE had a higher sensitivity (0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.90) but a lower specificity (0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.91) than CT.

CONCLUSION

CT was the best method for diagnosing abdominal pathology outside the colon. CT can be recommended as the first examination in seriously ill patients where abscesses and other causes of the symptoms than diverticulitis must first be ruled out. Laparoscopy is probably the most accurate method in diagnosing diverticulitis.

Для цитирования: Stefánsson T, Nyman R, Nilsson S, Ekbom A, Påhlman L. Diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon. A comparison of CT, colonic enema and laparoscopy.. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987). 1997. DOI: 10.1080/02841859709172071.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.