MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/qco.0b013e32830ce74b

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2008

Tick-borne encephalitis virus, ticks and humans: short-term and long-term dynamics.

Randolph Sarah E

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Much public health concern and scientific interest has been kindled by significant increases in incidence of tick-borne encephalitis over the past 1-2 decades. It is the most important vector-borne disease of humans in Europe, for which excellent long-term data allow robust quantitative analyses.

RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the increasing tendency to attribute all increases in vector-borne diseases to climate change, there is no convincing evidence that the appearance of new foci in Sweden, Switzerland, France and Germany during this century, or the upsurge in cases within well recognized endemic regions, is due to the recorded minor extensions of infectious ticks into higher altitudes and latitudes and into winter periods, in response to warmer conditions. Rather, there is now good evidence of greater human exposure to infected ticks through altered socioeconomic circumstances (in addition to higher densities of tick-feeding deer--not reviewed here), so far best quantified for Central and Eastern Europe.

SUMMARY: Increased awareness of tick-borne encephalitis and understanding of the changing risk factors, including the role of human behaviour, will ensure better personal protection against infection, including vaccination and avoidance of high-risk activities.

Для цитирования: Randolph Sarah E. Tick-borne encephalitis virus, ticks and humans: short-term and long-term dynamics.. Current opinion in infectious diseases. 2008. DOI: 10.1097/qco.0b013e32830ce74b.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.