Current oncology reports · 2019
Cardiovascular Effects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Agarwal Megha, Canan Timothy, Glover Greg, Thareja Nidhi, Akhondi Andre, Rosenberg Joshua
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: This review paper is a comprehensive look at the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk that is associated with the use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer. It summarizes when certain cancer therapies are indicated and should guide physicians in identifying patients at increased risk for CVD during prostate cancer therapy.
RECENT FINDINGS: GnRH agonist use and maximal androgen blockade (MAB) are associated with increased CVD. This association is not observed in patients on GnRH antagonists. One example is the novel agent abiraterone, which is associated with hypertension whose mechanisms are likely driven by mineralocorticoid excess. Incidence of cardiovascular disease events is greatest when using MAB, especially in patients with pre-existing CVD. There is significant confounding that exists given patients with more aggressive cancers tend to be older and have more co-existing CVD. Given the lower CVD event rates with GnRH antagonists, future studies and strategies should focus on high-risk cancer patients with co-existing CVD receiving antagonists over agonists.
RECENT FINDINGS: GnRH agonist use and maximal androgen blockade (MAB) are associated with increased CVD. This association is not observed in patients on GnRH antagonists. One example is the novel agent abiraterone, which is associated with hypertension whose mechanisms are likely driven by mineralocorticoid excess. Incidence of cardiovascular disease events is greatest when using MAB, especially in patients with pre-existing CVD. There is significant confounding that exists given patients with more aggressive cancers tend to be older and have more co-existing CVD. Given the lower CVD event rates with GnRH antagonists, future studies and strategies should focus on high-risk cancer patients with co-existing CVD receiving antagonists over agonists.