Techniques in urology · 2001
Inguinovaginal sling procedure for female stress incontinence: introduction of a minimally invasive technique.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leissner J, Allhoff E P, Naumann G, Pretzsch G, Höckel M, Black P, Hohenfellner R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The inguinovaginal sling procedure is well accepted for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Although the functional results are excellent, the operative trauma is higher compared to that of more recently used minimally invasive techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified inguinovaginal sling procedure was performed in 15 patients with urodynamically diagnosed intrinsic sphincter deficiency. With the assistance of a laparoscope, two fascial strips were dissected using two small suprapubic skin incisions. The pullthrough maneuver of the fascial slings was facilitated by opening the perivesical space with an inflatable balloon.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Mean follow-up of 7.7 months (range 4 to 11) was available in all patients. Stress incontinence was cured in 14 patients; only one woman reported using one pad per day. All patients were able to void spontaneously after a mean of 8 days (range 6 to 10).
CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopically assisted inguinovaginal sling procedure is less invasive than the original technique. Good long-term results are known from the original inguinovaginal sling procedure, and there is no need for allografts or synthetic material.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified inguinovaginal sling procedure was performed in 15 patients with urodynamically diagnosed intrinsic sphincter deficiency. With the assistance of a laparoscope, two fascial strips were dissected using two small suprapubic skin incisions. The pullthrough maneuver of the fascial slings was facilitated by opening the perivesical space with an inflatable balloon.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Mean follow-up of 7.7 months (range 4 to 11) was available in all patients. Stress incontinence was cured in 14 patients; only one woman reported using one pad per day. All patients were able to void spontaneously after a mean of 8 days (range 6 to 10).
CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopically assisted inguinovaginal sling procedure is less invasive than the original technique. Good long-term results are known from the original inguinovaginal sling procedure, and there is no need for allografts or synthetic material.