MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000000687

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2014

Oral mucosa harvest for urologic reconstruction: role of maxillofacial surgeon and donor-site morbidity evaluation.

Fasolis Massimo, Zavattero Emanuele, Sedigh Omidreza, Gontero Paolo, Preto Mirko, Frea Bruno, Ramieri Guglielmo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to present retrospective analysis of our experience regarding complications associated with the donor site after oral mucosa harvest for urethral reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Between May 2010 and January 2013, a total of 18 patients with recurrent urethral strictures received a buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction at the San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin. All operations were performed in a 2-team approach. All patients were retrospectively evaluated by clinical examination and using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Urethroplasty with oral mucosa graft was performed successfully in a 1-step procedure in 17 of 18 patients. No intraoperative complications were observed.The most common complication occurring at the buccal donor site was scarring and contracture (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral mucosa graft for urethroplasty is a simple and safe method in the interdisciplinary treatment of urethral strictures. Donor-site morbidity measured by clinical assessment and questionnaire is tolerable.

Для цитирования: Fasolis Massimo, Zavattero Emanuele, Sedigh Omidreza, Gontero Paolo, Preto Mirko, Frea Bruno, Ramieri Guglielmo. Oral mucosa harvest for urologic reconstruction: role of maxillofacial surgeon and donor-site morbidity evaluation.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000000687.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.