Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2015
[Prognostic factors for severe infection after flexible ureteroscopy: Clinical interest of urine culture the day before surgery?].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alezra E, Lasselin J, Forzini T, François T, Viart L, Saint F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study have been to determine prognostic factors for acute pyelonephritis (AP) after flexible ureteroscopy (FU), to assess the frequency of readmission for AP and to study the usefulness of urinalysis the day before surgery.
METHODS: Between 2010 and 2013, 266 patients have had at least one ureteroscopy (n=325). All infectious complications and unplanned readmissions within the month after FU were retrospectively evaluated. Several data have been collected: age, sex, BMI, surgical indication (calculis or tumor), number of previous ureteroscopies, number of previous surgeries for calculis, stones number, size and location, bilateral interventions, operating time, preoperative ureteral stenting, postoperative stenting, hospitalization stay, urine culture the day before surgery (j-1) and prescription of antibiotic therapy the week before FU. Correlation between these variables and acute pyelonephritis (AP) the month following the USSR was tested (StatView 4.5, SAS Institute) (P<0.05 significant).
RESULTS: We observed 24 postoperative APs (7.4%), 17 prior to hospital discharge and 7 requiring rehospitalization. In univariate analysis, the significant prognostic factors of postoperative AP have been: stone size (>14 mm) (P=0.03); operating time (70 minutes) (P<0.005); positive day - 1 urine culture (P<0.001); antibiotics treatment the week before FU (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, antibiotics prescription during the week before USSR remained significant (P<0.002; RR 5.8 [1.9-15]).
CONCLUSION: Acute pyelonephritis requiring unplanned admission after ureteroscopy is a rare complication (2.4%). Urinalysis one day before ureteroscopy could allow early antibiotic therapy and may reduce 63% of unplanned hospital admissions for acute pyelonephritis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.
METHODS: Between 2010 and 2013, 266 patients have had at least one ureteroscopy (n=325). All infectious complications and unplanned readmissions within the month after FU were retrospectively evaluated. Several data have been collected: age, sex, BMI, surgical indication (calculis or tumor), number of previous ureteroscopies, number of previous surgeries for calculis, stones number, size and location, bilateral interventions, operating time, preoperative ureteral stenting, postoperative stenting, hospitalization stay, urine culture the day before surgery (j-1) and prescription of antibiotic therapy the week before FU. Correlation between these variables and acute pyelonephritis (AP) the month following the USSR was tested (StatView 4.5, SAS Institute) (P<0.05 significant).
RESULTS: We observed 24 postoperative APs (7.4%), 17 prior to hospital discharge and 7 requiring rehospitalization. In univariate analysis, the significant prognostic factors of postoperative AP have been: stone size (>14 mm) (P=0.03); operating time (70 minutes) (P<0.005); positive day - 1 urine culture (P<0.001); antibiotics treatment the week before FU (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, antibiotics prescription during the week before USSR remained significant (P<0.002; RR 5.8 [1.9-15]).
CONCLUSION: Acute pyelonephritis requiring unplanned admission after ureteroscopy is a rare complication (2.4%). Urinalysis one day before ureteroscopy could allow early antibiotic therapy and may reduce 63% of unplanned hospital admissions for acute pyelonephritis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.