The British journal of dermatology · 2026
Spatiotemporal transcriptomics deciphered neutrophil-activated interleukin-36 as driver and effective therapeutic target in Sweet syndrome.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fu Yifan, Wu Chao, Pang Zhiyu, Liu Tiejun, Jia Qiannan, Liu Yuehua, Li Hongchun, Zhang Shiyu, Zhang Hanlin, Li Xingyu, Wang Sifan, Feng Jindi, Liu Jia, Lv Ying, Zhang Feifan, Chen Wei, Jin Hongzhong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sweet syndrome (SS), also known as acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, is characterized by painful erythematous plaques or nodules with diffuse infiltration of mature neutrophils in the dermis. Most patients respond well to systemic corticosteroids, except for a few resistant cases. SS may be idiopathic or triggered by trauma, infection, drugs and immune disorders. The exact pathogenesis, pathophysiology and precise treatment options beyond corticosteroids remain unclear.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to gain a better understanding of the role of interleukin (IL)-36 signalling in SS and to examine the effect of treatment with spesolimab, an anti-IL-36R monoclonal antibody, in patients with SS.
METHODS: We used spesolimab to treat two patients with SS and achieved favourable outcomes; however, the molecular mechanism of action involved in this treatment has not been proven. Here, we applied spatiotemporal transcriptomics at single-cell resolution and multiplex immunofluorescence on the skin lesion and blood samples from patients with SS before, during and after anti-IL-36R treatment.
RESULTS: The release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) was observed in the distinct NETosis neutrophil lineage infiltrating SS lesions, which secreted neutrophil elastase to splice full-length IL-36 proteins into their active forms, amplifying the inflammatory signal. The colocalized niches of neutrophils with heterogeneous maturation and IL36RN+ differentiated keratinocytes were found at dermoepidermal junction. The neutrophil-activated IL-36 signalling was considered as rapid inflammatory response and was eliminated after treatment. Meanwhile, CD8+ T cells were also recruited and participated in the interferon signalling and interacted with keratinocytes and neutrophils in the SS lesion, which was considered a delayed inflammatory response.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a forward loop consisting of keratinocytes, neutrophils with heterogenous maturation and CD8+ T cells was constructed to decipher the potential pathogenesis of SS. IL-36 activated by neutrophil elastase released from these neutrophils was one of the drivers of the loop. Moreover, IL-36 signalling was confirmed as a novel and effective treatment target for SS, which may serve as an alternative option for corticosteroid-resistant cases and patients with contraindications.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to gain a better understanding of the role of interleukin (IL)-36 signalling in SS and to examine the effect of treatment with spesolimab, an anti-IL-36R monoclonal antibody, in patients with SS.
METHODS: We used spesolimab to treat two patients with SS and achieved favourable outcomes; however, the molecular mechanism of action involved in this treatment has not been proven. Here, we applied spatiotemporal transcriptomics at single-cell resolution and multiplex immunofluorescence on the skin lesion and blood samples from patients with SS before, during and after anti-IL-36R treatment.
RESULTS: The release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) was observed in the distinct NETosis neutrophil lineage infiltrating SS lesions, which secreted neutrophil elastase to splice full-length IL-36 proteins into their active forms, amplifying the inflammatory signal. The colocalized niches of neutrophils with heterogeneous maturation and IL36RN+ differentiated keratinocytes were found at dermoepidermal junction. The neutrophil-activated IL-36 signalling was considered as rapid inflammatory response and was eliminated after treatment. Meanwhile, CD8+ T cells were also recruited and participated in the interferon signalling and interacted with keratinocytes and neutrophils in the SS lesion, which was considered a delayed inflammatory response.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a forward loop consisting of keratinocytes, neutrophils with heterogenous maturation and CD8+ T cells was constructed to decipher the potential pathogenesis of SS. IL-36 activated by neutrophil elastase released from these neutrophils was one of the drivers of the loop. Moreover, IL-36 signalling was confirmed as a novel and effective treatment target for SS, which may serve as an alternative option for corticosteroid-resistant cases and patients with contraindications.