Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation · 2015
Efficacy and safety of tandem hemodialysis and immunoadsorption to desensitize kidney transplant candidates.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rostaing Lionel, Maggioni Sébastien, Hecht Corinne, Hermelin Martine, Faudel Eric, Kamar Nassim, Sallusto Federico, Doumerc Nicolas, Allal Asma
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a desensitization program in our center in patients undergoing kidney transplant for end-stage renal disease. These patients had a living-donor either ABO incompatible and/or human-leukocyte antigen-incompatible. The safety and efficacy of this program were evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pretransplant desensitization program relies on immunosuppressants and apheresis to remove detrimental antibodies. We chose immunoadsorption as the apheresis technique, and coupled this with hemodialysis in a tandem procedure.
RESULTS: We report on the efficacy of this new method in 120 procedures performed in 20 patients (14 ABO incompatible, 6 ABO incompatible/human leukocyte antigen-incompatible). The tandem procedure was well tolerated, and saved time compared with conducting sequential immunoadsorption and hemodialysis (6 h vs 10 h). The tandem procedure was associated with significantly decreased isoagglutinin titers and donor-specific alloantibodies (assessed by mean fluorescence intensity). Dialysance was effective (183, 102-264). The biochemical and hematologic parameters were similar to those observed after a conventional hemodialysis session, with the exception of protidemia; this might be related to some degree of albumin loss during the immunoadsoprtion procedure. The posttransplant events included 1) one ABO incompatible / human leukocyte antigenincompatible patient with vein thrombosis and ultimate kidney loss; 2) two patients with steroidsensitive cellular acute rejection; and 3) two patients with acute antibody-mediated rejection, which was successfully treated with apheresis and steroid pulses, plus rituximab in one and eculizumab in the other.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the tandem immunoadsorption-hemodialysis procedure is efficient at desensitizing patients with end-stage renal disease who are candidates for a living ABO incompatible and/or human leukocyte antigenincompatible donor-kidney transplant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pretransplant desensitization program relies on immunosuppressants and apheresis to remove detrimental antibodies. We chose immunoadsorption as the apheresis technique, and coupled this with hemodialysis in a tandem procedure.
RESULTS: We report on the efficacy of this new method in 120 procedures performed in 20 patients (14 ABO incompatible, 6 ABO incompatible/human leukocyte antigen-incompatible). The tandem procedure was well tolerated, and saved time compared with conducting sequential immunoadsorption and hemodialysis (6 h vs 10 h). The tandem procedure was associated with significantly decreased isoagglutinin titers and donor-specific alloantibodies (assessed by mean fluorescence intensity). Dialysance was effective (183, 102-264). The biochemical and hematologic parameters were similar to those observed after a conventional hemodialysis session, with the exception of protidemia; this might be related to some degree of albumin loss during the immunoadsoprtion procedure. The posttransplant events included 1) one ABO incompatible / human leukocyte antigenincompatible patient with vein thrombosis and ultimate kidney loss; 2) two patients with steroidsensitive cellular acute rejection; and 3) two patients with acute antibody-mediated rejection, which was successfully treated with apheresis and steroid pulses, plus rituximab in one and eculizumab in the other.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the tandem immunoadsorption-hemodialysis procedure is efficient at desensitizing patients with end-stage renal disease who are candidates for a living ABO incompatible and/or human leukocyte antigenincompatible donor-kidney transplant.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
ABO Blood-Group SystemBlood Component RemovalBlood Group IncompatibilityDesensitization, ImmunologicGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHLA AntigensHistocompatibilityHistocompatibility TestingHumansImmunosorbentsIsoantibodiesKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationProgram EvaluationRenal DialysisRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome