American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2000
Failure of serum beta2-microglobulin levels as an early marker of preeclampsia.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haddad B, Desvaux D, Livingston J C, Barranger E, Paniel B J, Sibai B M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether second-trimester maternal serum beta(2)-microglobulin levels could be used to predict subsequent development of preeclampsia.
STUDY DESIGN: We first did a cross-sectional study to compare serum concentrations of beta(2)-microglobulin between women with preeclampsia and normotensive women. Serum beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations of 11 consecutive patients hospitalized for preeclampsia were compared with those of 11 normotensive women hospitalized for threatened premature labor. The second part of the study consisted of a nested case-control study in which each woman in whom preeclampsia ultimately developed was matched with 2 women who remained normotensive throughout gestation. For that purpose a total of 450 consecutive healthy nulliparous women were studied prospectively. Blood samples were collected between 20 and 24.9 weeks' gestation and frozen at -20 degrees C until assay after groups had been selected.
RESULTS: In the cross-sectional study serum beta(2)-microglobulin levels were significantly higher in women with preeclampsia than in control women (1.87 +/- 0.36 mg/L vs 1.01 +/- 0. 12 mg/L; t = 7.61; P <.0001). Among the 450 women who were followed up prospectively, preeclampsia developed in 7 (1.5 %). Fourteen of the women who remained normotensive were matched with the 7 women in whom preeclampsia ultimately developed. No difference was found in early serum beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations between women in whom preeclampsia subsequently developed and those who remained normotensive throughout gestation (1.02 +/- 0.12 vs 0.95 +/- 0.12 mg/L).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum beta(2)-microglobulin levels do not predict subsequent preeclampsia.
STUDY DESIGN: We first did a cross-sectional study to compare serum concentrations of beta(2)-microglobulin between women with preeclampsia and normotensive women. Serum beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations of 11 consecutive patients hospitalized for preeclampsia were compared with those of 11 normotensive women hospitalized for threatened premature labor. The second part of the study consisted of a nested case-control study in which each woman in whom preeclampsia ultimately developed was matched with 2 women who remained normotensive throughout gestation. For that purpose a total of 450 consecutive healthy nulliparous women were studied prospectively. Blood samples were collected between 20 and 24.9 weeks' gestation and frozen at -20 degrees C until assay after groups had been selected.
RESULTS: In the cross-sectional study serum beta(2)-microglobulin levels were significantly higher in women with preeclampsia than in control women (1.87 +/- 0.36 mg/L vs 1.01 +/- 0. 12 mg/L; t = 7.61; P <.0001). Among the 450 women who were followed up prospectively, preeclampsia developed in 7 (1.5 %). Fourteen of the women who remained normotensive were matched with the 7 women in whom preeclampsia ultimately developed. No difference was found in early serum beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations between women in whom preeclampsia subsequently developed and those who remained normotensive throughout gestation (1.02 +/- 0.12 vs 0.95 +/- 0.12 mg/L).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum beta(2)-microglobulin levels do not predict subsequent preeclampsia.