MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.053

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2006

Microscopic hematuria as a predictive factor for detecting bladder cancer at cystoscopy in women with irritative voiding symptoms.

Wu Jennifer M, Williams Kathryn S, Hundley Andrew F, Jannelli Mary L, Visco Anthony G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess microscopic hematuria as a predictive factor for detecting bladder cancer at cystoscopy in women with irritative voiding symptoms.

STUDY

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of women with irritative voiding symptoms who presented for urodynamic testing and cystoscopy. Irritative voiding symptoms were defined as urgency, urge incontinence, frequency, dysuria, and/or nocturia. Patient demographics, risk factors for bladder cancer, presence of microscopic hematuria, urodynamic findings, and cystoscopy and biopsy results were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 735 patients with irritative voiding symptoms, 264 (35.9%) had microscopic hematuria and 471 (64.1%) had no hematuria. Bladder cancer was detected in 3 women, for an overall detection rate of 0.4%. Microscopic hematuria, urgency, frequency, dysuria, nocturia, age, and tobacco use were not significantly associated with bladder cancer.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of women with irritative voiding symptoms, microscopic hematuria was not predictive for bladder cancer.

Для цитирования: Wu Jennifer M, Williams Kathryn S, Hundley Andrew F, Jannelli Mary L, Visco Anthony G. Microscopic hematuria as a predictive factor for detecting bladder cancer at cystoscopy in women with irritative voiding symptoms.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.053.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.