Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2023
Comparison research on the therapeutic effects of botulinum toxin type A and stromal vascular fraction gel on hypertrophic scars in the rabbit ear model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qian Yao, Wei Wang, Pan Tianyun, Lu Jianfeng, Wei Ying
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is often used for wrinkles and muscle convulsive diseases due to its blocking of the transmission of nerve impulses. Stromal vascular fraction gel (SVF-gel) prepared from adipose tissue has novel effects on skin depression and poor texture. Both BTA and SVF-gel are proved to possess anti-scar potential. This study aimed to assess and compare their therapeutic effects on hypertrophic scars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The rabbit ear scar model was established and treated with BTA and SVF-gel, alone or in combination. Gross evaluation using Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) was conducted immediately, 4 and 8 weeks after initial treatment. After tissue sample harvest, histological and Western blot analyses were performed.
RESULTS: All the treatments alleviated scar hyperplasia in different degrees by inhibiting fibroblast activation (Ki-67, α-SMA), tissue inflammation (CD45, IL-1β) and the transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)/Smad3 pathway. Despite an excellent anti-inflammatory effect, improvement of scar appearance and pathological characteristics in SVF-gel-contained groups was not as good as that in BTA-only group, which might be related to the retention of M2-type macrophages (CD163 +) and partial maintenance of TGF-β1 expression.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that BTA has better anti-scar efficacy than SVF-gel, and the combination of these two treatments shows no obvious combinatorial effect.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The rabbit ear scar model was established and treated with BTA and SVF-gel, alone or in combination. Gross evaluation using Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) was conducted immediately, 4 and 8 weeks after initial treatment. After tissue sample harvest, histological and Western blot analyses were performed.
RESULTS: All the treatments alleviated scar hyperplasia in different degrees by inhibiting fibroblast activation (Ki-67, α-SMA), tissue inflammation (CD45, IL-1β) and the transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)/Smad3 pathway. Despite an excellent anti-inflammatory effect, improvement of scar appearance and pathological characteristics in SVF-gel-contained groups was not as good as that in BTA-only group, which might be related to the retention of M2-type macrophages (CD163 +) and partial maintenance of TGF-β1 expression.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that BTA has better anti-scar efficacy than SVF-gel, and the combination of these two treatments shows no obvious combinatorial effect.