MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.70.377

Медицинская библиотека · Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases · 1996

[A family outbreak of Chlamydia psittaci infection].

Miyashita Y, Nakamori Y

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A family outbreak (3 cases) of Chlamydia psittaci infection was reported. The first case, a 56-year-old man was admitted with fever and general fatigue. Chest X-ray film revealed a consolidation in the right lower lung. One month before admission he had purchased 2 parakeets (chick) and one parakeet died. On learning of his history of contact with the chick, psittacosis was suspected. After administration of fixation (CF) antibody titer against chlamydia rose to 1:128 and IgA titer against Chlamydia psittaci by microimmunofluorescence antibody technique (MAF) rose to 1:128 in 21 days after admission. The second case, the wife of the first, a 53-year-old woman had a fever and a cough about two weeks before the admission of the first case. At the time of her husband was admitted, she attended the outpatient department. The chest CT X-ray film showed a ground glass appearance in both lower lung fields. The third case, the daughter of the first, didn't have any signs. Chest X-ray film was normal. But IgM titer against Chlamydia psittaci by MAF rose to 1:16 and IgA titer against Chlamydia psittaci by MAF rose to 1:128. This case was considered as inapparent infection.

Для цитирования: Miyashita Y, Nakamori Y. [A family outbreak of Chlamydia psittaci infection].. Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. 1996. DOI: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.70.377.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.