OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
Robot-assisted fracture fixation in orthopaedic trauma surgery: a systematic review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schuijt Henk Jan, Hundersmarck Dennis, Smeeing Diederik Pieter Johan, van der Velde Detlef, Weaver Michael John
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: To investigate the applications of robot-assisted surgery and its effect on surgical outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients.
DATA SOURCES: A search was performed in PubMed and Embase for articles in English, Dutch, German, or French, without restrictions on follow-up times, study size, or year of publication.
STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they investigated patients undergoing robot-assisted fracture fixation surgery for orthopaedic trauma.
DATA EXTRACTION: Outcomes studied were operating time, fluoroscopy time/frequency, complications, functional outcomes, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, and screw placement accuracy. Critical appraisal was done by using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Narrative review.
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 3832 hits were identified with the search and 8 studies were included with a combined total of 437 included patients, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 cohort study not otherwise specified, 1 case series, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Four studies investigated pelvic ring fractures, 3 studies investigated femur fractures, and 1 study investigated scaphoid fractures. Seven investigated percutaneous screw fixation and 1 studied intramedullary nail fixation. One robotic system was used across all studies, the TiRobot, and all procedures were performed in China. The limited evidence suggests that that robot-assisted orthopaedic trauma surgery may reduce operating time, use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, and improve screw placement accuracy, but the overall quality of evidence was low with a high risk of bias. Robot-assisted fracture fixation does not appear to lead to better functional outcomes for the patient.Level of evidence: III.
DATA SOURCES: A search was performed in PubMed and Embase for articles in English, Dutch, German, or French, without restrictions on follow-up times, study size, or year of publication.
STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they investigated patients undergoing robot-assisted fracture fixation surgery for orthopaedic trauma.
DATA EXTRACTION: Outcomes studied were operating time, fluoroscopy time/frequency, complications, functional outcomes, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, and screw placement accuracy. Critical appraisal was done by using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Narrative review.
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 3832 hits were identified with the search and 8 studies were included with a combined total of 437 included patients, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 cohort study not otherwise specified, 1 case series, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Four studies investigated pelvic ring fractures, 3 studies investigated femur fractures, and 1 study investigated scaphoid fractures. Seven investigated percutaneous screw fixation and 1 studied intramedullary nail fixation. One robotic system was used across all studies, the TiRobot, and all procedures were performed in China. The limited evidence suggests that that robot-assisted orthopaedic trauma surgery may reduce operating time, use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, and improve screw placement accuracy, but the overall quality of evidence was low with a high risk of bias. Robot-assisted fracture fixation does not appear to lead to better functional outcomes for the patient.Level of evidence: III.