Methyldopa versus labetalol or no medication for treatment of mild and moderate chronic hypertension during pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

to assess the maternal and fetal outcome in women with mild to moderate chronic hypertension on antihypertensive drug (methyldopa or labetalol) therapy compared to no medication.

METHODS

This multicenter randomized clinical study was conducted at Menoufia University hospital, Shibin El-kom Teaching hospital at Menoufia governorate, Egypt.486 pregnant women with mild to moderate chronic hypertension were randomized into three groups; methyldopa group (n = 164), labetalol group (n = 160), and control or no medication group (n = 162) who were followed from the beginning of pregnancy till the end of puerperium to record maternal and fetal outcome.

RESULTS

There was a highly significant difference between treatment groups (methyldopa and labetalol) and control group regarding the development of maternal severe hypertension, development of preeclampsia, renal impairment, presence of ECG changes, placental abruption, and repeated admission to hospital for blood pressure control (p < 0.001) with higher occurrence in the control (no treatment) group. Neonates in the labetalol group were more prone for the development of small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal hypotension, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and admission to NICU than their counterparts in the methyldopa and control groups (p < 0.001). The rate of prematurity was significantly higher in the control group than the treatment groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of mild to moderate chronic hypertension during pregnancy is beneficial in decreasing both maternal and fetal morbidity. The use of labetalol was associated with higher rates of SGA, neonatal hypotension, and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia compared to methyldopa or no medication.