Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2011
Does conventional or single port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy affect female sexual function?
Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Jung Hun, Choi Joong Sub, Hong Jin Hwa, Joo Kwan Joong, Kim Bum Young
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of conventional and single port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) on sexual function in premenopausal women.
DESIGN: A prospective case-control study.
SETTING: University teaching hospital. Population. A total of 95 premenopausal women having LAVH from January 2009 to December 2009.
METHODS: Comparison of 47 premenopausal women who had single port LAVH using trans-umbilical GelPort access (SP-LAVH group) and 48 premenopausal women who had conventional multiport LAVH (conventional LAVH group).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of sexual function was done prior to and six months after surgery using a validated tool, the female sexual function index (FSFI).
RESULTS: In terms of women's demographic characteristics and operative results, there was no significant difference between the two study groups, or between pre- and postoperative individual domain scores or total female sexual function index in women who underwent either conventional or single port LAVH.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither conventional nor single port LAVH affects sexual function in premenopausal women. Women can be counseled that this type of surgery is unlikely to alter sexual function.
DESIGN: A prospective case-control study.
SETTING: University teaching hospital. Population. A total of 95 premenopausal women having LAVH from January 2009 to December 2009.
METHODS: Comparison of 47 premenopausal women who had single port LAVH using trans-umbilical GelPort access (SP-LAVH group) and 48 premenopausal women who had conventional multiport LAVH (conventional LAVH group).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of sexual function was done prior to and six months after surgery using a validated tool, the female sexual function index (FSFI).
RESULTS: In terms of women's demographic characteristics and operative results, there was no significant difference between the two study groups, or between pre- and postoperative individual domain scores or total female sexual function index in women who underwent either conventional or single port LAVH.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither conventional nor single port LAVH affects sexual function in premenopausal women. Women can be counseled that this type of surgery is unlikely to alter sexual function.