BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025
A latent profile analysis of heterogeneity in self-management behavior of gestational diabetes mellitus patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Yunmei, Zhou Ming, Yan Xin, Liu Ying, Wang LianHong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To identify latent profiles of self-management behaviors among patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and develop targeted interventions.
METHOD: s Between July 2023 and October 2023, 320 GDM patients were surveyed using a self-management behavior questionnaire. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to identify subgroups of GDM patients. Subsequent multinomial latent variable regressions were used to identify factors associated with self-management behavior.
RESULTS: 23.0%, 47.0%, and 29.9% of respondents were classified into high, moderate, and low self-management groups, respectively, based on the results of the latent profile analysis. The three different categories demonstrated statistically significant differences across scale scores and dimensions (all p < 0.001). The findings showed that age was a predictor of class 2 (OR:0.93,95%CI:0.872-0.994)and was associated with reduced self-management behavior. The higher BIPS(OR:1.03,95%CI:1.007-1.044;OR:1.04,95%CI:1.015-1.057) and QOL(OR:1.05,95%CI:1.028-1.077;OR:1.06,95%CI:1.036-1.092) mean scores were significantly more likely to be in class2 and class3. Patients with a sleep disorder (OR:0.32,95%CI:0.167-0.599; OR:0.27,95%CI:0.130-0.544)were significantly more likely to be class 2 and class 3. Having a blood glucose normal before pregnancy(OR:4.17,95%CI:1.013-17.295) was significantly more likely to be in class 3.
CONCLUSION: The GDM patient population is heterogeneous, with distinct subtypes that may benefit from tailored, multi-level interventions.
METHOD: s Between July 2023 and October 2023, 320 GDM patients were surveyed using a self-management behavior questionnaire. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to identify subgroups of GDM patients. Subsequent multinomial latent variable regressions were used to identify factors associated with self-management behavior.
RESULTS: 23.0%, 47.0%, and 29.9% of respondents were classified into high, moderate, and low self-management groups, respectively, based on the results of the latent profile analysis. The three different categories demonstrated statistically significant differences across scale scores and dimensions (all p < 0.001). The findings showed that age was a predictor of class 2 (OR:0.93,95%CI:0.872-0.994)and was associated with reduced self-management behavior. The higher BIPS(OR:1.03,95%CI:1.007-1.044;OR:1.04,95%CI:1.015-1.057) and QOL(OR:1.05,95%CI:1.028-1.077;OR:1.06,95%CI:1.036-1.092) mean scores were significantly more likely to be in class2 and class3. Patients with a sleep disorder (OR:0.32,95%CI:0.167-0.599; OR:0.27,95%CI:0.130-0.544)were significantly more likely to be class 2 and class 3. Having a blood glucose normal before pregnancy(OR:4.17,95%CI:1.013-17.295) was significantly more likely to be in class 3.
CONCLUSION: The GDM patient population is heterogeneous, with distinct subtypes that may benefit from tailored, multi-level interventions.