Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
Short-Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation With Portico or Navitor Valves: The Barts Heart Center Experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tufaro Vincenzo, Mukhopadhyay Sumanto, Opada Katreena, Patel Kush, Ozkor Mick, Baumbach Andreas, Mullen Michael J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Degeneration of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves is increasingly common. Redo surgical aortic valve replacement carries substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly or high-risk patients. Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an established alternative, though data on the performance of self-expanding Portico and Navitor valves remain limited.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 47 consecutive patients who underwent ViV TAVI for severe bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction between January 2020 and June 2024 at Barts Heart Center. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were evaluated using Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria.
RESULTS: The median age was 79 years, and 80.9% had small surgical valves (≤ 23 mm). ViV TAVI with Portico or Navitor valves was successful in 46 cases (97.9%), with no in-hospital mortality or need for emergency cardiac surgery. Technical success was achieved in 89.4% of cases; failures were related to two major vascular complications, two valve-related interventions, and one major cardiac structural complication. At 30 days, device success and safety outcomes were favorable, with no deaths or additional major complications. Two patients (4.3%) experienced ischemic stroke, and one (2.8%) required a new permanent pacemaker. Most patients (97.8%) were in NYHA class I-II. Echocardiography confirmed intended valve performance in 87% of cases, with no moderate or severe aortic regurgitation.
CONCLUSIONS: ViV TAVI with Portico and Navitor valves is a safe and effective option for failed surgical bioprostheses, including small valves, offering excellent short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess long-term durability.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 47 consecutive patients who underwent ViV TAVI for severe bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction between January 2020 and June 2024 at Barts Heart Center. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were evaluated using Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria.
RESULTS: The median age was 79 years, and 80.9% had small surgical valves (≤ 23 mm). ViV TAVI with Portico or Navitor valves was successful in 46 cases (97.9%), with no in-hospital mortality or need for emergency cardiac surgery. Technical success was achieved in 89.4% of cases; failures were related to two major vascular complications, two valve-related interventions, and one major cardiac structural complication. At 30 days, device success and safety outcomes were favorable, with no deaths or additional major complications. Two patients (4.3%) experienced ischemic stroke, and one (2.8%) required a new permanent pacemaker. Most patients (97.8%) were in NYHA class I-II. Echocardiography confirmed intended valve performance in 87% of cases, with no moderate or severe aortic regurgitation.
CONCLUSIONS: ViV TAVI with Portico and Navitor valves is a safe and effective option for failed surgical bioprostheses, including small valves, offering excellent short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess long-term durability.