Ginekologia polska · 2017
Is routine performance of the uterine cervix canal curettage prior to the curettage of the uterine cavity justified?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Piątek Szymon, Lipa Jacek, Górska Monika, Malecha Katarzyna, Panek Grzegorz, Wielgoś Mirosław
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Endocervical curettage (ECC) together with the dilatation and curettage of the uterine cavity (D & C) is routinely performed in everyday clinical practice. The aim of this study is to assess the rationale of the performance of ECC prior to D & C in indications other than abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Case histories of 736 patients after ECC performed in the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Warsaw, were analyzed retrospectively, the indications for the procedure - age, menopausal status, parity, procedure operator's experience - as well as the result of the histopathology examination were taken into account. Three groups of patients were distinguished based on the indications for the procedure.
RESULTS: In 645 (87.6%) of cases normal histopathology results were obtained. 40 (5.4%) cases were abnormal. 31 cases of uterine cervix dysplasia were disclosed (CIN 1-20; CIN 2-5; CIN 3-6), 8 cases of endometrial cancer and 1 case of cancer of the uterine cervix were disclosed. In 51 (7%) of cases tissue material for histopathology examination was not obtained. In patients where ECC and D & C were performed due to indications other than abnormal bleeding from uterine cavity, no abnormal results were revealed. In addition, in this group the highest number of non-diagnostic ECCs was reported (11.59%; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In the case of endometrial biopsy for indications other than AUB routine ECC prior to D & C need not be performed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Case histories of 736 patients after ECC performed in the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Warsaw, were analyzed retrospectively, the indications for the procedure - age, menopausal status, parity, procedure operator's experience - as well as the result of the histopathology examination were taken into account. Three groups of patients were distinguished based on the indications for the procedure.
RESULTS: In 645 (87.6%) of cases normal histopathology results were obtained. 40 (5.4%) cases were abnormal. 31 cases of uterine cervix dysplasia were disclosed (CIN 1-20; CIN 2-5; CIN 3-6), 8 cases of endometrial cancer and 1 case of cancer of the uterine cervix were disclosed. In 51 (7%) of cases tissue material for histopathology examination was not obtained. In patients where ECC and D & C were performed due to indications other than abnormal bleeding from uterine cavity, no abnormal results were revealed. In addition, in this group the highest number of non-diagnostic ECCs was reported (11.59%; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In the case of endometrial biopsy for indications other than AUB routine ECC prior to D & C need not be performed.