Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2002
Differential diagnosis of benign versus malignant nonfunctioning islet cell tumors of the pancreas: the roles of EUS and ERCP.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sugiyama Masanori, Abe Nobutsugu, Izumisato Yumi, Yamaguchi Yasuharu, Yamato Taro, Tokuhara Makoto, Masaki Tadahiko, Mori Toshiyuki, Atomi Yutaka
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Differentiation between benign and malignant nonfunctioning islet cell tumors of the pancreas before surgery is often difficult. The roles of EUS and ERCP were evaluated in the differential diagnosis of these tumors.
METHODS: Seven patients with histologically confirmed nonfunctioning islet cell tumors (4 benign, 3 malignant) underwent EUS and ERCP.
OBSERVATIONS: EUS demonstrated a homogeneous hypoechoic mass or a hypoechoic mass with a regular central echogenic area in the 4 cases of benign tumor, and a hypoechoic mass with an irregular central echogenic area in all 3 cases of malignant tumor. The irregular central echogenic area corresponded to severe hemorrhage, necrosis, or fibrosis with hyalinosis (hyaline degeneration) on pathologic examination. ERCP demonstrated displacement or complete obstruction (because of ductal invasion) of the main pancreatic duct in 2 patients with malignant tumors and no abnormalities in the other 5 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonfunctioning islet cell tumors, a hypoechoic mass with an irregular central echogenic area on EUS or complete obstruction of the main pancreatic duct on ERCP suggests malignancy.
METHODS: Seven patients with histologically confirmed nonfunctioning islet cell tumors (4 benign, 3 malignant) underwent EUS and ERCP.
OBSERVATIONS: EUS demonstrated a homogeneous hypoechoic mass or a hypoechoic mass with a regular central echogenic area in the 4 cases of benign tumor, and a hypoechoic mass with an irregular central echogenic area in all 3 cases of malignant tumor. The irregular central echogenic area corresponded to severe hemorrhage, necrosis, or fibrosis with hyalinosis (hyaline degeneration) on pathologic examination. ERCP demonstrated displacement or complete obstruction (because of ductal invasion) of the main pancreatic duct in 2 patients with malignant tumors and no abnormalities in the other 5 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonfunctioning islet cell tumors, a hypoechoic mass with an irregular central echogenic area on EUS or complete obstruction of the main pancreatic duct on ERCP suggests malignancy.