Pediatric obesity · 2020
Infant growth during the first year of life following a pregnancy lifestyle intervention in routine care-Findings from the cluster-randomised GeliS trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hoffmann Julia, Günther Julia, Stecher Lynne, Spies Monika, Geyer Kristina, Raab Roxana, Meyer Dorothy, Rauh Kathrin, Hauner Hans
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions in pregnancy may influence postpartum development and obesity risk in offspring. The impact of lifestyle interventions as health system-based approaches is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention conducted as public health approach on infant development and feeding practices.
METHODS: We followed offspring born to women participating in the cluster-randomised GeliS trial who received usual care (CG) or repeated lifestyle counselling (IG). We collected data on offspring development and complementary feeding until the 12th month postpartum.
RESULTS: Of the 1998 mother-child pairs, 1783 completed the follow-up. Mean infant weight at 12 months was comparable between groups (IG: 9497.9 ± 1137.0 g; CG: 9433.4 ± 1055.2 g; P = .177). There was no significant evidence of differences in sex- and age-adjusted z-scores or in the odds of offspring being overweight. More infants in the IG received whole-grain products compared to the CG (95.6% vs. 90.8%; P = .003). Despite small differences in the timing of introducing solid foods, there were no further significant differences in the pattern of complementary feeding.
CONCLUSIONS: The antenatal lifestyle intervention embedded in routine care did not substantially influence infant anthropometrics and is thus unlikely to impact future development.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention conducted as public health approach on infant development and feeding practices.
METHODS: We followed offspring born to women participating in the cluster-randomised GeliS trial who received usual care (CG) or repeated lifestyle counselling (IG). We collected data on offspring development and complementary feeding until the 12th month postpartum.
RESULTS: Of the 1998 mother-child pairs, 1783 completed the follow-up. Mean infant weight at 12 months was comparable between groups (IG: 9497.9 ± 1137.0 g; CG: 9433.4 ± 1055.2 g; P = .177). There was no significant evidence of differences in sex- and age-adjusted z-scores or in the odds of offspring being overweight. More infants in the IG received whole-grain products compared to the CG (95.6% vs. 90.8%; P = .003). Despite small differences in the timing of introducing solid foods, there were no further significant differences in the pattern of complementary feeding.
CONCLUSIONS: The antenatal lifestyle intervention embedded in routine care did not substantially influence infant anthropometrics and is thus unlikely to impact future development.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultChild DevelopmentDirective CounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGestational Weight GainHealthy LifestyleHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal BehaviorPediatric ObesityPregnancyPrenatal CareProspective StudiesProtective FactorsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeWeight GainYoung Adult