MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004132.pub2

Медицинская библиотека · The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008

Interventions for motor apraxia following stroke.

West C, Bowen A, Hesketh A, Vail A

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Apraxia is a cognitive disorder that can occur after stroke. It prevents a person from carrying out a learned movement. Various interventions are used to treat apraxia but evidence of their benefit has been lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which therapeutic interventions targeted at motor apraxia reduce disability.

SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched November 2006). In addition, we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2007), EMBASE (1980 to November 2006), CINAHL (1982 to November 2006), PsycINFO (1974 to November 2006), the Research Index of the Occupational Therapy Journal (searched November 2006), REHABDATA (1956 to November 2006), the National Research Register (searched November 2006) and Current Controlled Trials Register (searched November 2006). We reviewed the reference lists of all articles that we identified as relevant. We made efforts to find both published and unpublished trials by writing to key authors and journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of therapeutic intervention for motor apraxia in stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author searched the titles, abstracts and keywords. Four review authors extracted data and analysed trial quality. We contacted investigators for further details of trials if necessary.

MAIN

RESULTS

Three trials including a total of 132 participants were included in the review. There was evidence of a small and short-lived therapeutic effect in the two studies that reported change in activities of daily living (102 participants) but this was not considered clinically significant and did not persist at the longer-term follow up.

AUTHORS'

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of specific therapeutic interventions for motor apraxia after stroke. Further research of higher quality is required. As we did not review whether patients with apraxia benefit from rehabilitation input in general, they should continue to receive general stroke rehabilitation services.

Для цитирования: West C, Bowen A, Hesketh A, Vail A. Interventions for motor apraxia following stroke.. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004132.pub2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.