MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.11.002

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of adolescence · 2018

Considering the negatively formed identity: Relationships between negative identity and problematic psychosocial beliefs.

Hihara Shogo, Umemura Tomotaka, Sugimura Kazumi

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Developing a firm sense of identity is a critical developmental task in adolescence and emerging adulthood, but little or no empirical research exists regarding individuals who firmly form negative identities and psychosocial beliefs. This study examined the formation of negative identities in youth and its association with psychosocial beliefs in terms of variable-oriented psychosocial facets (i.e., dichotomous beliefs, cynicism, and social distrust) and person-oriented psychosocial profiles.

METHODS

A total of 2313 young Japanese people (70.9% were females) aged 18-25 years answered the self-report questionnaire.

RESULTS

We consequently found that individuals with negative identities possessed problematic psychosocial facets, such as high dichotomous beliefs and cynicism, as well as low social trust. Furthermore, individuals with negative identities had profile characterized by strong hostility toward others/societies.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our study provided a comprehensive understanding of how youth with negative identities face difficulty in constructing relationships with society, which has been neglected in prior research.

Для цитирования: Hihara Shogo, Umemura Tomotaka, Sugimura Kazumi. Considering the negatively formed identity: Relationships between negative identity and problematic psychosocial beliefs.. Journal of adolescence. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.11.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.