The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2021
Analysis of Clinical Pathway for Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Kangxin, Lin Yan, Gao Yuan, Wang Yuqun
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the implementation of a clinical pathway (CP) and identify clinical factors affecting the CP for cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients.
METHODS: A specific CP for CLP patients was developed at CLP Medical Center of Stomatological Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University in 2008. The authors reviewed the collected data of 1810 consecutive patients using the CP for repairing cleft lip, cleft palatal, and alveolar cleft. The patients were treated between January 2008 and December 2019. The rate of completion and risk factors affecting dropout from the CP were analyzed.
RESULTS: The completion rates of the CP in cleft lip, cleft palate and alveolar cleft patients were 68.3% (n = 345), 82.4% (n = 785) and 76.1% (n = 268), respectively. The overall completion rate was 77.2% (n = 1398). The main reasons for dropping out were pre-operation events (n = 212, 11.7%) and post-operation events (n = 188, 10.4%). Among the factors of dropout of CP, laboratory test abnormalities accounted for the majority of pre- and post-operation events (n = 179, 9.9%). In statistical analysis, the combined abnormities and events associated with operations were significant risk factors affecting the dropout rate from CP.
CONCLUSION: The use of CP for CLP patients was reliable but the completion rate was relatively low because of perioperative events. These results provided some evidence of risk factors which should be considered when modifying the protocol of CP for CLP patients in order to achieve higher completion rate.
METHODS: A specific CP for CLP patients was developed at CLP Medical Center of Stomatological Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University in 2008. The authors reviewed the collected data of 1810 consecutive patients using the CP for repairing cleft lip, cleft palatal, and alveolar cleft. The patients were treated between January 2008 and December 2019. The rate of completion and risk factors affecting dropout from the CP were analyzed.
RESULTS: The completion rates of the CP in cleft lip, cleft palate and alveolar cleft patients were 68.3% (n = 345), 82.4% (n = 785) and 76.1% (n = 268), respectively. The overall completion rate was 77.2% (n = 1398). The main reasons for dropping out were pre-operation events (n = 212, 11.7%) and post-operation events (n = 188, 10.4%). Among the factors of dropout of CP, laboratory test abnormalities accounted for the majority of pre- and post-operation events (n = 179, 9.9%). In statistical analysis, the combined abnormities and events associated with operations were significant risk factors affecting the dropout rate from CP.
CONCLUSION: The use of CP for CLP patients was reliable but the completion rate was relatively low because of perioperative events. These results provided some evidence of risk factors which should be considered when modifying the protocol of CP for CLP patients in order to achieve higher completion rate.