Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
The effect of prophylaxis with ertapenem versus cefuroxime/metronidazole on intestinal carriage of carbapenem-resistant or third-generation-cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales after colorectal surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hoffman Tomer, Lellouche Jonathan, Nutman Amir, Temkin Elizabeth, Frenk Sammy, Harbarth Stephan, Carevic Biljana, Cohen-Percia Shimrit, Kariv Yehuda, Fallach Noga, Klausner Joseph, Carmeli Yehuda, Resistance in Gram-Negative Organisms: Studying Intervention Strategies (R-GNOSIS) WP4 Study Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Compared to cephalosporin-based prophylaxis, ertapenem prophylaxis lowers the risk of surgical site infection among carriers of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PEs) undergoing colorectal surgery. We aimed to determine whether ertapenem prophylaxis leads to increased postoperative colonization with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CREs) and third-generation-cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCR-Es).
METHODS: This study was nested within a quality improvement study of prophylaxis for ESBL-PE carriers undergoing colorectal surgery. Patients were screened 4-6 days after surgery for carriage of ESBL-PEs or other 3GCR-Es and CREs. When CREs were detected, pre- and postsurgical clones were compared using Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 56 patients who carried ESBL-PEs before surgery and received cefuroxime/metronidazole prophylaxis (Group 1), 66 who carried ESBL-PEs before surgery and received ertapenem (Group 2), and 103 ESBL-PE non-carriers who received cefuroxime/metronidazole prophylaxis (Group 3). CRE carriage was detected postoperatively in one patient (1.5%) in Group 2 versus eight patients (14.3%) in Group 1 (RD -12.8%; 95%CI -22.4% to -3.1%). For seven out of nine patients, preoperative ESBL-PE and postoperative CRE isolates were compared; in five of them, the pre- and postoperative clones were identical. Postoperative 3GCR-E carriage was detected in 37 patients (56.1%) in Group 2 versus 46 patients in Group 1 (82.1%) (aRD -20.7%, 95%CI -37.3% to -4.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Among ESBL-PE carriers undergoing colorectal surgery, detection of short-term postsurgical colonization by CREs and 3GCR-Es was significantly lower among patients who received ertapenem prophylaxis than those who received cephalosporin-metronidazole prophylaxis. Resistance development in a colonizing bacterial clone, rather than carbapenemase acquisition, was the major mechanism of carbapenem resistance.
METHODS: This study was nested within a quality improvement study of prophylaxis for ESBL-PE carriers undergoing colorectal surgery. Patients were screened 4-6 days after surgery for carriage of ESBL-PEs or other 3GCR-Es and CREs. When CREs were detected, pre- and postsurgical clones were compared using Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy.
RESULTS: The sample consisted of 56 patients who carried ESBL-PEs before surgery and received cefuroxime/metronidazole prophylaxis (Group 1), 66 who carried ESBL-PEs before surgery and received ertapenem (Group 2), and 103 ESBL-PE non-carriers who received cefuroxime/metronidazole prophylaxis (Group 3). CRE carriage was detected postoperatively in one patient (1.5%) in Group 2 versus eight patients (14.3%) in Group 1 (RD -12.8%; 95%CI -22.4% to -3.1%). For seven out of nine patients, preoperative ESBL-PE and postoperative CRE isolates were compared; in five of them, the pre- and postoperative clones were identical. Postoperative 3GCR-E carriage was detected in 37 patients (56.1%) in Group 2 versus 46 patients in Group 1 (82.1%) (aRD -20.7%, 95%CI -37.3% to -4.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Among ESBL-PE carriers undergoing colorectal surgery, detection of short-term postsurgical colonization by CREs and 3GCR-Es was significantly lower among patients who received ertapenem prophylaxis than those who received cephalosporin-metronidazole prophylaxis. Resistance development in a colonizing bacterial clone, rather than carbapenemase acquisition, was the major mechanism of carbapenem resistance.