MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90140-8

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 1981

Insect venom allergy: a prospective case study showing lack of correlation between immunologic reactivity and clinical sensitivity.

Reisman R E, Lazell M, Doerr J

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This case report demonstrates the lack of correlation between clinical sensitivity to insect venoms and immunologic reactivity as indicated by the presence of venom-specific IgG. A 20-yr-old venom collector was monitored over a 3-yr period with measurements of venom-specific IgE (skin test and RAST) and venom-specific IgG. In the first year of venom collection, multiple stings were tolerated with no reaction. In the second season, she had an anaphylactic reaction after a yellow jacket sting. Subsequently, there was a rising titer of serum yellow jacket and bee venom-specific IgE and positive skin-test reactions. In the third season, yellow jacket, hornet, and bee venom skin tests remained positive and serum IgE antibody titers remained elevated. Stings from all three insects were tolerated with no reaction. Throughout the 3-yr course, serum venom-specific IgG remained low and unchanged. The factors other than IgE-modulating clinical anaphylaxis, perhaps responsible for this clinical and immunologic dichotomy, are unknown. These observations add a further complication to the choice of patients for venom immunotherapy.

Для цитирования: Reisman R E, Lazell M, Doerr J. Insect venom allergy: a prospective case study showing lack of correlation between immunologic reactivity and clinical sensitivity.. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 1981. DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90140-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.