MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3791/65849

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023

Rat Model of Closed-Head Mild Traumatic Injury and its Validation.

Liu Yishu, Wang Tingting, Zhang Changquan, Cai Jifeng

СтатьяVideo-Audio MediaПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Animal models are crucial for advancing our understanding of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and guiding clinical research. To achieve meaningful insights, developing a stable and reproducible animal model is essential. In this study, we report a detailed description of a closed-head mTBI model and a representative validation method using Sprague-Dawley rats to verify the modeling effect. The model involves dropping a 550 g mass weight from a height of 100 cm directly onto the head of a rat on a destructible surface, followed by a 180-degree turn. To assess the injury, rats underwent a series of neurobehavioral assessments 10 min post-injury, including time of loss of consciousness, first seeking-behavior time, escape ability, and beam balance ability test. During the acute and subacute stages following the injury, behavioral tests were conducted to assess motor coordination ability (Beam task), anxiety (Open Field test), and learning and memory abilities (Morris Water Maze test). The closed-head mTBI model produced a consistent injury response with minimal mortality and replicated real-life situations. The validation method effectively verified the model development and ensured the stability and consistency of the model.

Для цитирования: Liu Yishu, Wang Tingting, Zhang Changquan, Cai Jifeng. Rat Model of Closed-Head Mild Traumatic Injury and its Validation.. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. 2023. DOI: 10.3791/65849.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.