DOI 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.177015
Cardiovascular effects of Roflumilast during sepsis: Risks or benefits?
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) is responsible for terminating cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signalling. PDE4 inhibitors, such as roflumilast (RFM), have anti-inflammatory activity and have been studied in inflammation-induced tissue damage in sepsis. However, the role of RFM on cardiovascular derangements induced by sepsis is still unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the potential effects of RFM on cardiovascular collapse and multiorgan damage caused by sepsis.
METHODS
Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in male rats. Six hours after the CLP or sham procedure, animals were randomly assigned to receive either RFM (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously, and cardiovascular parameters were assessed 24 h after the surgery and organ/plasma samples were collected for further analyses.
RESULTS
Sepsis induced hypotension, tachycardia, reduced renal blood flow (RBF) and hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictors both in vivo and ex vivo. RFM treatment increased systemic cAMP levels and RBF. RFM also attenuated hypoperfusion and liver damage induced by CLP. Furthermore, RFM reduced systemic nitric oxide (NO) levels in septic rats, while there were no changes in hepatic NOS-2 expression. Nevertheless, RFM exacerbated sepsis-induced hypotension and tachycardia without ameliorating vascular hyporeactivity.
CONCLUSION
Our data show that PDE-4 inhibition protects septic rats from hepatic injury and improves renal perfusion. However, RFM worsened hemodynamic parameters and showed no protection against sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction and mortality. Thus, despite the anti-inflammatory benefits of RFM, its application in sepsis should be approached cautiously.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.