MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.10.011

Медицинская библиотека · Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2019

A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for risk prediction of asthma disease.

Ullah Rahat, Khan Saranjam, Ali Hina, Chaudhary Iqra Ishtiaq, Bilal Muhammad, Ahmad Iftikhar

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Asthma is a chronic disease characterized by wheezing, chest tightening and difficulty in breathing due to inflammation of lung airways. Early risk prediction of asthma is crucial for proper and effective management. This study presents the use of machine learning approach for risk prediction of asthma by evaluating Raman spectral variations between asthmatic as well as healthy sera samples. Specifically, Raman spectra from 150 asthma and 52 healthy control blood sera samples were acquired. Spectral analyses illustrated significant spectral variations (p < 0.0001) in the asthmatic samples when compared with healthy sera. The existing spectral differences were further exploited by using artificial neural network (ANN) along with support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) algorithms towards machine-assisted classification of the two groups. Quantitative comparison of the evaluation metrics of the classification algorithms showed superior performance of SVM model. Our results indicate that Raman spectroscopy in tandem with SVM can be used in the diagnosis and machine-assisted classification of asthma patients with promising accuracy.

Для цитирования: Ullah Rahat, Khan Saranjam, Ali Hina, Chaudhary Iqra Ishtiaq, Bilal Muhammad, Ahmad Iftikhar. A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for risk prediction of asthma disease.. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.10.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.