MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.02.025

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical imaging · 2008

Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation: how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect?

Kim Min Jung, Kim Eun-Kyung, Keum Ki Chang, Park Byeong-Woo, Son Eun Ju, Oh Ki Keun

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether diagnostic interpretation of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images for radiation planning in breast irradiation detects a considerable number of unexpected abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

One hundred thirty-one patients underwent treatment-planning CT scans for breast or chest-wall irradiation. A diagnostic radiologist prospectively reviewed each scan and determined the incidence of previously unknown findings, the impacts of such findings on treatment, and the need for additional radiological studies based on the CT interpretation.

RESULTS

Eighty-six scans were prospectively classified as negative findings, 27 scans were classified as incidental benign findings, 26 scans were classified as medically important findings of which only one case was metastatic.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of clinically important coexistent diseases in CT scans for radiation planning in breast irradiation is very low, although the CT scans were performed with intravenous contrast administration insofar as the preoperative evaluation was appropriate.

Для цитирования: Kim Min Jung, Kim Eun-Kyung, Keum Ki Chang, Park Byeong-Woo, Son Eun Ju, Oh Ki Keun. Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation: how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect?. Clinical imaging. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.02.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.