MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014480

Медицинская библиотека · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026

Disability as a neglected outcome of neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review.

Barrionuevo Caio Cesar Leiva Bastos, Valente Jefferson da Silva, Silva Bernardo Maia da, Goulart Cássia da Luz, Maciel Alex, Santos-de-Araújo Aldair Darlan, Amaral Camila Miriam Suemi Sato Barros do, Silva Junior Eduardo Fernandes da, Santos Stephanie Vitória Alves Dos, Gomes Erika, Cubas-Vega Nadia, Arêas Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco, Almeida-Val Fernando

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) affect more than one billion people worldwide, predominantly in low-resource settings. While substantial progress has been made in reducing transmission and mortality, the long-term disabilities resulting from NTDs remain insufficiently recognized and inadequately addressed within control programs.

OBJECTIVE

To identify, describe, and systematize the types of disabilities reported among individuals affected by NTDs, providing a comprehensive overview of the magnitude and diversity of long-term functional impairments associated with these conditions.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science databases, without restrictions on language or publication date. Studies reporting long-term disabilities or sequelae in individuals diagnosed with WHO-listed NTDs were included. Data on study characteristics, population demographics, and disability types were extracted and synthesized descriptively. Methodological quality was assessed using design-specific tools (MINORS, CARE checklist, and Jadad scale).

RESULTS

The initial search identified 958 records across databases. After removal of duplicates (n = 478), 480 records were screened, of which 310 were assessed for full-text eligibility. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 130 studies were included in the final analysis, encompassing 551,574 individuals from 25 countries. Overall, 29% (n = 158,104) of evaluated individuals presented with at least one form of disability. Physical and motor impairments were the most prevalent (24.6%, n = 135,683), predominantly associated with leprosy-related neuropathic and musculoskeletal sequelae. Visual impairment was the second most frequent disability (1.81%, n = 10,007), largely attributable to trachoma and onchocerciasis. Cardiovascular, neurological, psychological, and social impairments were also reported. Considerable heterogeneity and underreporting of disability outcomes were observed across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Disability represents a substantial and underappreciated outcome of NTDs, extending far beyond infection-related morbidity. The high burden of long-term physical, visual, and other functional impairments underscores the urgent need to integrate disability assessment, rehabilitation services, and disability-inclusive development into NTD control strategies. Addressing these gaps is essential to advance patient-centered care and achieve the broader goals of the WHO NTD Roadmap and Universal Health Coverage.

Для цитирования: Barrionuevo Caio Cesar Leiva Bastos, Valente Jefferson da Silva, Silva Bernardo Maia da, Goulart Cássia da Luz, Maciel Alex, Santos-de-Araújo Aldair Darlan, Amaral Camila Miriam Suemi Sato Barros do, Silva Junior Eduardo Fernandes da, Santos Stephanie Vitória Alves Dos, Gomes Erika, Cubas-Vega Nadia, Arêas Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco, Almeida-Val Fernando. Disability as a neglected outcome of neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review.. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014480.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.