MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.09.035

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2015

Spontaneous rupture of the urinary bladder (SRUB); A case report and review of literature.

Sawalmeh Haitham, Al-Ozaibi Labib, Hussein Ahmed, Al-Badri Faisal

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous urinary bladder rupture is a rare urological emergency. It is usually secondary to an underlying pathology and it is an uncommon complication of urosepsis. We report a case of spontaneous urinary bladder rupture as a complication of urosepsis in a 67 year old male patient, who was admitted as a case of left diabetic foot and urinary tract infection.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 67 year old male patient with a long standing indwelling urinary catheter and chronic cystitis developed acute peritonitis. Intraoperative finding was ruptured urinary bladder.

DISCUSSION: A few cases of spontaneous urinary bladder rupture due to infection were found in literature. The majority of the patients present with diffuse abdominal pain, and tenderness due to chemical peritonitis. In the majority of cases the bladder perforation was diagnosed intra-operative.

CONCLUSION

A diagnosis of spontaneous perforation of the bladder should be considered in patients presenting with an acute abdomen. The general surgeon is more likely than the urologist to encounter such patients in the first instance. There should be a high index of suspicion in patients with an acute abdomen and have associated urinary bladder condition.

Для цитирования: Sawalmeh Haitham, Al-Ozaibi Labib, Hussein Ahmed, Al-Badri Faisal. Spontaneous rupture of the urinary bladder (SRUB); A case report and review of literature.. International journal of surgery case reports. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.09.035.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.