MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3349/ymj.2002.43.1.133

Медицинская библиотека · Yonsei medical journal · 2002

Two primary intracranial tumors of different histology: report of a case with a choroid plexus papilloma and a concurrent vestibular schwannoma in the cerebellopontine angle.

Lee Kyu-Sung, Seo Eui Kyo

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A very rare case of multiple primary intracranial tumors is reported. A 41-year-old female patient was referred for surgery with a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor. Medical history and MRI study showed typical findings of a right acoustic neuroma with a hydrocephalus. Neurological, dermatological, and ocular examinations revealed no evidence of neurofibromatosis. During surgery, a red-colored cauliflower like mass was found in the right CPA. The roof of the fourth ventricle could be seen through the lateral recess after removal of the tumor. Another mass, a 1.5-cm sized schwannoma protruding through the right internal auditory meatus, was removed by the transmeatal approach. Although the tumor masses were in contact and compressed against each other, there was a clear demarcation between them. Histological examination confirmed that the first mass was a typical choroid plexus papilloma with fibrovascular core, and that the second was a schwannoma. The patient recovered without any new neurological deficit. Result of a Medline search indicated that this rare combination of multiple primary tumors has not been reported previously.

Для цитирования: Lee Kyu-Sung, Seo Eui Kyo. Two primary intracranial tumors of different histology: report of a case with a choroid plexus papilloma and a concurrent vestibular schwannoma in the cerebellopontine angle.. Yonsei medical journal. 2002. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2002.43.1.133.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.