MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine · 2016

Kommerell Diverticulum in Adults: Evaluation of Routine CT Examinations.

Ichikawa Tamaki, Koizumi Jun, Tanno Keisuke, Okochi Tomohisa, Nomura Takakiyo, Shimura Shinichiro, Imai Yutaka

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Objection: To evaluate of Kommerell diverticulum (KD) in adults during routine CT examinations.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Eighty-seven cases of left aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery (LAARS) and 28 cases of right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery (RAALS) were found on routine CT examinations using 64-128 multidetector CT. We assessed the incidence of KD and measured the size of KD, and compared the results between both groups. We evaluated associated congenital and acquired cardiovascular diseases on both groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of KD in each group was as follows: RAALS 100 % and LAARS 48.3 % and incidence of KD in RAALS group was significant higher than in LAARS group. The mean KD size was as follows: RAALS 32.8 mm and LAARS 17.8 mm and, the size of KD in RAALS group was larger than that in LAARS group. Two cases were associated with congenital heart disease. Several cases were associated with acquired aortic diseases including aortic aneurysm, dissection, severe atherosclerosis and aortitis.

CONCLUSION

KD was common among adults with an ASA and some adults were associated with aortic diseases.

Для цитирования: Ichikawa Tamaki, Koizumi Jun, Tanno Keisuke, Okochi Tomohisa, Nomura Takakiyo, Shimura Shinichiro, Imai Yutaka. Kommerell Diverticulum in Adults: Evaluation of Routine CT Examinations.. The Tokai journal of experimental and clinical medicine. 2016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.