MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09513590600647326

Медицинская библиотека · Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology · 2006

Comparison of three sperm retrieval techniques in spinal cord-injured men: pregnancy outcome.

Engin-Uml Stün Yaprak, Korkmaz Cem, Duru Namik Kemal, Başer Iskender

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To compare pregnancy outcomes between three sperm retrieval techniques - electroejaculation, testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and prostatic massage - in spinal cord-injured men.

METHOD: Forty-four patients who became paraplegic due to spinal cord injuries by land mines and bullets, and who underwent infertility treatment during 1998-2005, were included. Eight men were treated with rectal probe electroejaculation, 26 with TESE and ten with prostatic massage. The pregnancy rate and live birth rate resulting from the embryo transfers of all cycles were calculated.

RESULTS

Eight singleton pregnancies were achieved, two in the electroejaculation group, four in the TESE group and two in the prostatic massage group. Live birth rate was not significantly different between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the different sperm retrieval techniques used to obtain semen in spinal cord-injured men resulted in similar pregnancy outcomes.

Для цитирования: Engin-Uml Stün Yaprak, Korkmaz Cem, Duru Namik Kemal, Başer Iskender. Comparison of three sperm retrieval techniques in spinal cord-injured men: pregnancy outcome.. Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology. 2006. DOI: 10.1080/09513590600647326.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.