Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
Validation of an automated seizure detection algorithm for term neonates.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mathieson Sean R, Stevenson Nathan J, Low Evonne, Marnane William P, Rennie Janet M, Temko Andrey, Lightbody Gordon, Boylan Geraldine B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to validate the performance of a seizure detection algorithm (SDA) developed by our group, on previously unseen, prolonged, unedited EEG recordings from 70 babies from 2 centres.
METHODS: EEGs of 70 babies (35 seizure, 35 non-seizure) were annotated for seizures by experts as the gold standard. The SDA was tested on the EEGs at a range of sensitivity settings. Annotations from the expert and SDA were compared using event and epoch based metrics. The effect of seizure duration on SDA performance was also analysed.
RESULTS: Between sensitivity settings of 0.5 and 0.3, the algorithm achieved seizure detection rates of 52.6-75.0%, with false detection (FD) rates of 0.04-0.36FD/h for event based analysis, which was deemed to be acceptable in a clinical environment. Time based comparison of expert and SDA annotations using Cohen's Kappa Index revealed a best performing SDA threshold of 0.4 (Kappa 0.630). The SDA showed improved detection performance with longer seizures.
CONCLUSION: The SDA achieved promising performance and warrants further testing in a live clinical evaluation.
SIGNIFICANCE: The SDA has the potential to improve seizure detection and provide a robust tool for comparing treatment regimens.
METHODS: EEGs of 70 babies (35 seizure, 35 non-seizure) were annotated for seizures by experts as the gold standard. The SDA was tested on the EEGs at a range of sensitivity settings. Annotations from the expert and SDA were compared using event and epoch based metrics. The effect of seizure duration on SDA performance was also analysed.
RESULTS: Between sensitivity settings of 0.5 and 0.3, the algorithm achieved seizure detection rates of 52.6-75.0%, with false detection (FD) rates of 0.04-0.36FD/h for event based analysis, which was deemed to be acceptable in a clinical environment. Time based comparison of expert and SDA annotations using Cohen's Kappa Index revealed a best performing SDA threshold of 0.4 (Kappa 0.630). The SDA showed improved detection performance with longer seizures.
CONCLUSION: The SDA achieved promising performance and warrants further testing in a live clinical evaluation.
SIGNIFICANCE: The SDA has the potential to improve seizure detection and provide a robust tool for comparing treatment regimens.