Is ultrasound-guided suction curettage a reliable option for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy? A cross-sectional retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study is to present clinical courses and outcomes of 50 first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) cases, which are managed either with transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS)-guided suction curettage alone or abdominal hysterotomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our records from 2011 to 2016 at a single-center. TAUS-guided suction curettage alone was preferred in hemodynamically stable patients when the myometrial thickness was ≥3 mm and there was no vascular invasion. If the myometrial thickness was <3 mm and/or vascular invasion was present, then hysterotomy was preferred.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis of age, gravidity, parity, history of previous CS (≥3 or <3), presence of embryonic cardiac activity, complaints (vaginal bleeding, pelvic pain, or both), preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels (g/dl), blood transfusion, initial serum β-hCG levels, and duration to resolution of β-hCG demonstrated no significant difference between TAUS-guided suction curettage and abdominal hysterotomy groups. There was a significant difference between two groups in terms of postoperative length of stay in the hospital and gestational age.

CONCLUSION

TAUS-guided suction curettage in selected cases may be considered as a reliable first-line treatment option due to its low cost, ease of application, lower side-effect profile, and potentially minimal influence on future fertility in CSP patients that are hemodynamically stable.