American journal of ophthalmology · 2005
Test-retest reproducibility of optic disk deterioration detected from stereophotographs by masked graders.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parrish Richard K, Schiffman Joyce C, Feuer William J, Anderson Douglas R, Budenz Donald L, Wells-Albornoz Maria-Cristina, Vandenbroucke Ruth, Kass Michael A, Gordon Mae O, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of determining whether an eye has developed optic disk deterioration by the Optic Disc Reading Center (ODRC) in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).
DESIGN: Test-retest reproducibility study.
METHODS: Masked, certified graders at the ODRC determine the occurrence of optic disk deterioration in OHTS by comparing baseline with follow-up stereoscopic optic disk photographs. To assess reproducibility, re-gradings were obtained annually by inserting masked "quality control" photographs into the usual ODRC reading stream.
RESULTS: Agreement (kappa) ranged from 0.65 to 0.83 over 5 years. Specificity ranged from 98% to 100%, and sensitivity ranged from 64% to 81%.
CONCLUSIONS: The kappa statistic for test-retest agreement in OHTS is in the range considered good to excellent over 5 years. Consistency (specificity) in re-grading optic disks that did not develop deterioration was particularly high. The sensitivity results show that detecting subtle deterioration of optic disks is challenging.
DESIGN: Test-retest reproducibility study.
METHODS: Masked, certified graders at the ODRC determine the occurrence of optic disk deterioration in OHTS by comparing baseline with follow-up stereoscopic optic disk photographs. To assess reproducibility, re-gradings were obtained annually by inserting masked "quality control" photographs into the usual ODRC reading stream.
RESULTS: Agreement (kappa) ranged from 0.65 to 0.83 over 5 years. Specificity ranged from 98% to 100%, and sensitivity ranged from 64% to 81%.
CONCLUSIONS: The kappa statistic for test-retest agreement in OHTS is in the range considered good to excellent over 5 years. Consistency (specificity) in re-grading optic disks that did not develop deterioration was particularly high. The sensitivity results show that detecting subtle deterioration of optic disks is challenging.