The use of hyperventilation therapy after traumatic brain injury in Europe: an analysis of the BrainIT database.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To assess the use of hyperventilation and the adherence to Brain Trauma Foundation-Guidelines (BTF-G) after traumatic brain injury (TBI).
SETTING
Twenty-two European centers are participating in the BrainIT initiative.
DESIGN
Retrospective analysis of monitoring data.
PATIENTS AND
PARTICIPANTS
One hundred and fifty-one patients with a known time of trauma and at least one recorded arterial blood-gas (ABG) analysis.
MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS
A total number of 7,703 ABGs, representing 2,269 ventilation episodes (VE) were included in the analysis. Related minute-by-minute ICP data were taken from a 30 min time window around each ABG collection. Data are given as mean with standard deviation. (1) Patients without elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) (< 20 mmHg) manifested a statistically significant higher P(a)CO(2) (36 +/- 5.7 mmHg) in comparison to patients with elevated ICP (> or = 20 mmHg; P(a)CO(2): 34 +/- 5.4 mmHg, P < 0.001). (2) Intensified forced hyperventilation (P(a)CO(2) < or = 25 mmHg) in the absence of elevated ICP was found in only 49 VE (2%). (3) Early prophylactic hyperventilation (< 24 h after TBI; P(a)CO(2) < or = 35 mmHg, ICP < 20 mmHg) was used in 1,224 VE (54%). (4) During forced hyperventilation (P(a)CO(2) < or = 30 mmHg), simultaneous monitoring of brain tissue pO(2) or S(jv)O(2) was used in only 204 VE (9%).
CONCLUSION
While overall adherence to current BTF-G seems to be the rule, its recommendations on early prophylactic hyperventilation as well as the use of additional cerebral oxygenation monitoring during forced hyperventilation are not followed in this sample of European TBI centers.
DESCRIPTOR: Neurotrauma.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.