Diabetes research and clinical practice · 1990
The relevance of persistent C-peptide secretion in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus to glycaemic control and diabetic complications.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Winocour P H, Jeacock J, Kalsi P, Gordon C, Anderson D C
Аннотация
The effect of residual C-peptide secretion in longer standing IDDM on glycaemic control and the prevalence and evolution of complications over 2 years was evaluated. Thirty-one subjects with IDDM of 15.4 (1.5) years duration (mean SEM)) and residual C-peptide secretion, were matched for age, duration of diabetes and body mass index with 31 subjects without detectable C-peptide secretion. At trial entry and over 2 years, levels of HbA1, fructosamine and mean blood glucose were essentially similar in both groups. Levels of glycated albumin (GSA) were significantly higher in the C-peptide negative group after 3 and 9 months (P less than 0.05). An increased prevalence of proliferative retinopathy in the C-peptide negative group and of peripheral vascular disease in the C-peptide secretor group was apparent at entry to the study (both P less than 0.05), although no significant differences were observed after 1 or 2 years. There was no difference in the prevalence of peripheral or autonomic neuropathy, hypertension, nephropathy or ischaemic heart disease. Subjects with C-peptide concentrations greater than 0.100 pmol/ml at entry to this study had lower daily insulin requirements after 1 and 2 years, but behaved like the larger group with any detectable C-peptide secretion in all other respects. Residual C-peptide secretion was lost after 1 year in 7 patients, in whom glycaemic control during the year had been particularly poor. Insulin antibody titres were no different in the 2 groups at any time point. This study suggests that residual C-peptide secretion in longer standing IDDM confers the potential for limited improvements in glycaemic control. This effect appears to be insufficient to prevent the evolution of microvascular complications over a 2-year period. Residual C-peptide secretion and relative hyperinsulinaemia may be associated with an excess of peripheral vascular disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAlbuminuriaBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringBlood PressureC-PeptideCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic AngiopathiesDiabetic NephropathiesDiabetic NeuropathiesDiabetic RetinopathyFollow-Up StudiesFructosamineGlycated HemoglobinHexosaminesHumansHypertensionMiddle Aged