Anales de medicina interna (Madrid, Spain : 1984) · 1996
[Factors associated with pleural thickening in pleural tuberculosis. Review of 99 cases].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haro M, Ruiz Manzano J, Morera J, Manterola J M, Fiz J A, Izquierdo J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze which factors were related to the development of pleural thickening in pleural tuberculosis (PT).
METHODS: We reported 99 patients diagnosed as having PT separated into two different groups according to the presence of radiographic pleural thickening after completing the treatment: normal chest roentgenogram (group 1) or pleural thickening (group 2). We compared: clinical history, chest radiography, pleural fluid analysis, microbiological studies and effects of the treatment.
RESULTS: 35 cases in group 1 (35.35%) and 64 in group 2 (64.45%). All the compared results did not differ between the two groups, excluding a higher incidence of febrile cases, increased white cell count and decreased relative percentage of pleural lymphocytes in group 1, and increased number of cases with hemoptysis, positive sputum cultures in patients with parenchymal infiltrates, relative percentage of pleural lymphocytes and decreased white cell count in group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: We reported an elevated incidence of residual pleural thickening, but it is unlikely that all the cases could have any clinical significance. We didn't confirm a characteristic pattern. Our findings suggested that a different reaction related or not to the hypersensitivity, rather than the inflammatory response to infection was the responsible for the fibrosis.
METHODS: We reported 99 patients diagnosed as having PT separated into two different groups according to the presence of radiographic pleural thickening after completing the treatment: normal chest roentgenogram (group 1) or pleural thickening (group 2). We compared: clinical history, chest radiography, pleural fluid analysis, microbiological studies and effects of the treatment.
RESULTS: 35 cases in group 1 (35.35%) and 64 in group 2 (64.45%). All the compared results did not differ between the two groups, excluding a higher incidence of febrile cases, increased white cell count and decreased relative percentage of pleural lymphocytes in group 1, and increased number of cases with hemoptysis, positive sputum cultures in patients with parenchymal infiltrates, relative percentage of pleural lymphocytes and decreased white cell count in group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: We reported an elevated incidence of residual pleural thickening, but it is unlikely that all the cases could have any clinical significance. We didn't confirm a characteristic pattern. Our findings suggested that a different reaction related or not to the hypersensitivity, rather than the inflammatory response to infection was the responsible for the fibrosis.