MedElevator
Войти в исследования The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2004
Multivitamin-mineral supplementation is not as efficacious as is iron supplementation in improving hemoglobin concentrations in nonpregnant anemic women living in Mexico.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moriarty-Craige Siobhan E, Ramakrishnan Usha, Neufeld Lynnette, Rivera Juan, Martorell Reynaldo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Iron supplements improve hemoglobin status and reduce anemia due to iron deficiency. It is not known whether multiple micronutrient (MM) supplements are as efficacious as are iron supplements alone in improving hemoglobin concentrations.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a randomized, double-blind community trial in Mexico to compare the efficacy of MM supplements containing iron with that of iron alone in improving hemoglobin concentrations in nonpregnant women.
DESIGN: Nonpregnant women (n = 158) were recruited from a semirural community in Mexico and were randomly assigned to receive iron alone (60 mg; Fe group) or MM supplements (vitamins A, B complex, C, D, E, and K and iron, zinc, and magnesium; MM group) 6 d/wk in their home for 12 wk. Hemoglobin concentrations were measured in capillary blood samples at baseline and follow-up.
RESULTS: The treatment groups (MM: n = 75; Fe: n = 77) did not differ significantly at recruitment in age, schooling, literacy, or socioeconomic status. There were no significant differences between groups in compliance (median: 97.5%), baseline hemoglobin concentrations, or prevalence of anemia (20%). Losses to follow-up (4%) and mean (+/-SD) changes in hemoglobin (MM group: 6.7 +/- 10.6 g/L; Fe group: 7.1 +/- 13.6 g/L) were not significantly different between groups. However, the change in hemoglobin in anemic subjects was greater in the Fe group than in the MM group (P < 0.05 for interaction), and there was no significant difference in nonanemic subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: MM supplements may not be as efficacious as is iron alone in improving the hemoglobin status of anemic women.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a randomized, double-blind community trial in Mexico to compare the efficacy of MM supplements containing iron with that of iron alone in improving hemoglobin concentrations in nonpregnant women.
DESIGN: Nonpregnant women (n = 158) were recruited from a semirural community in Mexico and were randomly assigned to receive iron alone (60 mg; Fe group) or MM supplements (vitamins A, B complex, C, D, E, and K and iron, zinc, and magnesium; MM group) 6 d/wk in their home for 12 wk. Hemoglobin concentrations were measured in capillary blood samples at baseline and follow-up.
RESULTS: The treatment groups (MM: n = 75; Fe: n = 77) did not differ significantly at recruitment in age, schooling, literacy, or socioeconomic status. There were no significant differences between groups in compliance (median: 97.5%), baseline hemoglobin concentrations, or prevalence of anemia (20%). Losses to follow-up (4%) and mean (+/-SD) changes in hemoglobin (MM group: 6.7 +/- 10.6 g/L; Fe group: 7.1 +/- 13.6 g/L) were not significantly different between groups. However, the change in hemoglobin in anemic subjects was greater in the Fe group than in the MM group (P < 0.05 for interaction), and there was no significant difference in nonanemic subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: MM supplements may not be as efficacious as is iron alone in improving the hemoglobin status of anemic women.