MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1128/jcm.01050-25

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025

Improving time-to-result: head-to-head comparison of three rapid AST systems for Gram-negative bacteremia, including the newly developed VITEK REVEAL.

Squitieri Damiano, Menchinelli Giulia, Magrì Carlotta, D'Inzeo Tiziana, Fiori Barbara, Cacaci Margherita, Sanguinetti Maurizio, De Angelis Giulia, Posteraro Brunella

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Early antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in Gram-negative (GN) bloodstream infections is critical to guide appropriate therapy. This study evaluated three rapid AST (RAST) systems-VITEK REVEAL, direct-from-blood-culture VITEK 2 (VITEK 2-RAST), and EUCAST disk diffusion (DD-RAST)-using 220 prospectively collected GN-positive blood cultures (GN-PBCs). A total of 18 GN species were tested, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, against 25 antibiotics, four of which were next-generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics. Reference broth microdilution was used for comparison. The VITEK REVEAL assay showed 97.1% essential agreement (EA), -7.7 bias, and 98.3% categorical agreement (CA) across 3,603 organism/antibiotic combinations. The VITEK 2-RAST assay showed 96.2% EA, -10.4 bias, and 98.4% CA across 3,941 combinations. The DD-RAST assay showed 98.2% CA across 2,388 combinations. Among 164 GN-PBCs tested with all three assays, EA rates were 97.5% for VITEK REVEAL and 96.3% for VITEK 2-RAST, with bias values of -7.1 and -6.9, respectively. Across all three assays, the CA rate was ≥98.2%, and very major error (VME) rates were ≤1.8%. Mean time-to-result (TTR) was significantly shorter with VITEK REVEAL (6 h 32 min) compared to VITEK 2-RAST (13 h 51 min) and the fixed 8 h of DD-RAST. In resistant organisms, VITEK REVEAL produced significantly faster results than in susceptible or intermediate ones, including BL/BLI antibiotics. A. baumannii yielded the shortest TTR, with no observed VME. These results support the use of RAST directly on GN-PBCs, with VITEK REVEAL emerging as a particularly promising option for rapid and accurate testing.

IMPORTANCE

This study is the first to conduct a direct comparison of three rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) systems-VITEK REVEAL, VITEK 2-RAST, and DD-RAST-on a large, prospectively collected cohort of Gram-negative-positive blood cultures (GN-PBCs). The data offer valuable insights for laboratories evaluating RAST implementation, especially in EUCAST-based contexts. Among the systems tested, VITEK REVEAL stood out for its combination of rapid turnaround and high accuracy, including for antibiotic-resistant organisms and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics. These findings underscore the potential of RAST systems to deliver timely and reliable susceptibility results directly from GN-PBCs, thereby supporting more effective antimicrobial stewardship and clinical decision-making. However, the real-world impact will also depend on how well these systems integrate into routine workflows, as seamless implementation can directly affect time-to-result (TTR)-an essential element in optimizing the management of GN-bloodstream infection (BSI).

Для цитирования: Squitieri Damiano, Menchinelli Giulia, Magrì Carlotta, D'Inzeo Tiziana, Fiori Barbara, Cacaci Margherita, Sanguinetti Maurizio, De Angelis Giulia, Posteraro Brunella. Improving time-to-result: head-to-head comparison of three rapid AST systems for Gram-negative bacteremia, including the newly developed VITEK REVEAL.. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01050-25.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.