Reconsideration of Laparoscopic Kasai Operation for Biliary Atresia.

INTRODUCTION

Minimal invasive surgery for all kinds of surgical diseases had been practiced for years. The laparoscopic Kasai operation is one of the most challenging procedures and remains controversial for treating biliary atresia (BA).

PURPOSE: This work presented the initial experience of our Institute and compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic Kasai operations for BA.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Patients 18 years old and younger, and were operated in our Institute for BA from January 2011 to August 2017, were included in this study. General and operative data and outcomes from open and laparoscopic groups were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients (13 for conventional open operation and 10 for the laparoscopic procedure) received Kasai portoenterostomy. The mean operative age and body weight in the open versus laparoscopic groups were 57.15 ± 20.14 days old and 4.03 ± 0.69 kg versus 57.70 ± 43.06 days old and 4.49 ± 1.48 kg, respectively, and no statistical difference was observed. The mean operative times were 209.62 ± 60.40 and 293.50 ± 39.09 minutes in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The mean follow-up durations were 54.62 ± 22.00 and 23.30 ± 11.87 months for the open and laparoscopic patients, correspondingly. No statistically significant differences were observed for hospital stay and outcomes (including early jaundice clearance rate, episodes of cholangitis, and 2-year native liver survival rate) between the open and the laparoscopic Kasai operations.

CONCLUSION

Experienced pediatric laparoscopic surgeons may reconsider the laparoscopic Kasai operation for application to BA treatment.