Homologous recombination repair genetic testing variables and diagnostic paths for prostate cancer patients: a multicenter cohort study.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Incorvaia Lorena, Puglisi Mattia, Maruzzo Marco, Mammone Giulia, Caffo Orazio, Procopio Giuseppe, Antonuzzo Lorenzo, Rizzo Mimma, Conteduca Vincenza, Messina Carlo, Scagliarini Sarah, Maiorano Brigida, Santoni Matteo, Facchini Gaetano, Lipari Helga, Formisano Luigi, Stellato Marco, Basso Umberto, Rossetti Sabrina, Lai Eleonora, Arcara Carlo Carmelo, Bronte Enrico, Bazan Russo Tancredi Didier, Colletta Giovanni, Gristina Valerio, Pepe Francesco, Malapelle Umberto, Santini Daniele, Depetris Ilaria, Di Maio Massimo, Badalamenti Giuseppe, Bracarda Sergio, Russo Antonio
Аннотация
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational, cohort study, involving 20 Italian cancer centers. The study population included consecutive PC patients undergoing germline, tumor, and/or plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to profile HRR genes between January 1, 2020 and January 31, 2025.
RESULTS: Among 1400 PC patients included, 248 (17.7%) showed (likely)pathogenic variants (PVs) in the HRR genes. Most HRR testing was conducted during the metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC)(779, 62.8%). The rate of conclusive results was 89.7% and varied widely according to the type of tumor tissue. The prevalence of HRR alterations was 18.1% in the mCRPC and 13.8% in the hormone-sensitive PC (P = .06). The concordance between tumor testing and ctDNA was 83.9%. Interestingly, 4.6% reported ctDNA testing positive but tumor testing negative, leading to important therapeutic implications. The prevalence of positive ctDNA testing was 47.4% vs 10.5%, for testing within 1 month or over 3 months, respectively, from the initiation of a new line of therapy.
CONCLUSION: This large real-world study, through the workflow adopted by clinicians for HRR genomic testing, provides novel insights into the variables influencing the success rate of genomic testing.