MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/bjs.6417

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of surgery · 2009

Randomized clinical trial of visualization versus neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerves during thyroidectomy.

Barczyński M, Konturek A, Cichoń S

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) during thyroid surgery reduces injury, and that intraoperative nerve monitoring may be of additional benefit.

METHODS

One thousand consenting patients scheduled to have bilateral thyroid surgery were randomized to standard protection or additional nerve monitoring. The primary outcome measure was prevalence of RLN injury.

RESULTS

Of 1000 nerves at risk in each group, transient and permanent RLN injuries were found respectively in 38 and 12 nerves without RLN monitoring (P = 0.011) and 19 and eight nerves with RLN monitoring (P = 0.368). The prevalence of transient RLN paresis was lower in patients who had RLN monitoring by 2.9 per cent in high-risk patients (P = 0.011) and 0.9 per cent in low-risk patients (P = 0.249). The negative and positive predictive values of RLN monitoring in predicting postoperative vocal cord function were 98.9 and 37.8 per cent respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nerve monitoring decreased the incidence of transient but not permanent RLN paresis compared with visualization alone, particularly in high-risk patients.

REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00661024 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Для цитирования: Barczyński M, Konturek A, Cichoń S. Randomized clinical trial of visualization versus neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerves during thyroidectomy.. The British journal of surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6417.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.