American journal of infection control · 2011
Suppression of regrowth of normal skin flora under chlorhexidine gluconate dressings applied to chlorhexidine gluconate-prepped skin.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bashir Muhammad H, Olson Linda K M, Walters Shelley-Ann
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Catheter colonization and bloodstream infection during the first week after insertion of a central venous catheter have been shown to result from the patient's own skin flora.
METHODS: The backs of 32 healthy subjects were prepped with a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)/70% isopropyl alcohol antiseptic. Three dressings, 2 of which contained CHG, were placed on the prepped skin in a randomized design. Samples of aerobic bacteria were collected using the cup scrub method. Skin under the dressings was sampled by quadrant on days 1, 4, and 7. Relative suppression of regrowth was compared using an adjusted paired t test.
RESULTS: Mean log counts were 3.2 log(10) colony-forming units (CFU)/cm(2) before antisepsis and 0.4 after antisepsis. Mean log counts obtained on days 1, 4, and 7 were 0.4, 0.3, and 0.5 log(10) CFU/cm(2) for the CHG gel; 0.4, 0.4, and 0.9 log(10) CFU/cm(2) for the CHG disk; and 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 log(10) CFU/cm(2) for the Control, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Skin flora was not completely eradicated during antisepsis, and bacterial regrowth occurred postantisepsis. The use of CHG dressings helped sustain a reduced bacterial count on the skin. The continuously releasing CHG gel maintained suppression to a greater extent than the CHG disk at 7 days (P = .01).
METHODS: The backs of 32 healthy subjects were prepped with a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)/70% isopropyl alcohol antiseptic. Three dressings, 2 of which contained CHG, were placed on the prepped skin in a randomized design. Samples of aerobic bacteria were collected using the cup scrub method. Skin under the dressings was sampled by quadrant on days 1, 4, and 7. Relative suppression of regrowth was compared using an adjusted paired t test.
RESULTS: Mean log counts were 3.2 log(10) colony-forming units (CFU)/cm(2) before antisepsis and 0.4 after antisepsis. Mean log counts obtained on days 1, 4, and 7 were 0.4, 0.3, and 0.5 log(10) CFU/cm(2) for the CHG gel; 0.4, 0.4, and 0.9 log(10) CFU/cm(2) for the CHG disk; and 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 log(10) CFU/cm(2) for the Control, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Skin flora was not completely eradicated during antisepsis, and bacterial regrowth occurred postantisepsis. The use of CHG dressings helped sustain a reduced bacterial count on the skin. The continuously releasing CHG gel maintained suppression to a greater extent than the CHG disk at 7 days (P = .01).