Blood pressure monitoring · 2005
Side effects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van der Steen Marijke S, Lenders Jacques W M, Thien Theo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the experiences and complaints of patients who underwent 24 h blood pressure monitoring.
METHODS: Two groups of hypertensive patients of a tertiary outpatient clinic were asked to fill in a nine-item questionnaire about the side effects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The first group (n=75) used the auscultatory Oxford Medilog device (OM) and the second group (n=110) the oscillometric Spacelabs 90207 (SL).
RESULTS: The OM showed significantly less error readings (OM versus SL, 9 versus 19%; P=0.005) but was also less tolerated by the subjects. Sleep disturbance was noted in 53% of the OM patients group in comparison with 18% in the SL group (P<0.0001). Adjustment of daily activities occurred more often in the OM group (OM versus SL, 37 versus 19%; P=0.013) as did complaints of pain in the cuffed arm (OM versus SL, 31 versus 11 %; P=0.007). There was no difference in the proportion of patients that refused a second ABPM (OM versus SL, 11 versus 10%). Linear regression analyses showed that differences in side effects between the two devices were not due to differences in blood pressure, heart rate, age or sex.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that side effects of ABPM are not negligible and that there are differences between devices.
METHODS: Two groups of hypertensive patients of a tertiary outpatient clinic were asked to fill in a nine-item questionnaire about the side effects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The first group (n=75) used the auscultatory Oxford Medilog device (OM) and the second group (n=110) the oscillometric Spacelabs 90207 (SL).
RESULTS: The OM showed significantly less error readings (OM versus SL, 9 versus 19%; P=0.005) but was also less tolerated by the subjects. Sleep disturbance was noted in 53% of the OM patients group in comparison with 18% in the SL group (P<0.0001). Adjustment of daily activities occurred more often in the OM group (OM versus SL, 37 versus 19%; P=0.013) as did complaints of pain in the cuffed arm (OM versus SL, 31 versus 11 %; P=0.007). There was no difference in the proportion of patients that refused a second ABPM (OM versus SL, 11 versus 10%). Linear regression analyses showed that differences in side effects between the two devices were not due to differences in blood pressure, heart rate, age or sex.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that side effects of ABPM are not negligible and that there are differences between devices.